Fostering collaboration for open access publishing models: a study of the Polish ecosystem in the area of open access monographs in the humanities

Magdalena Wnuk; Marta Świetlik

doi:10.53377/lq.23471

Authors

Dr. Magdalena Wnuk Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-6664
Dr. Marta M. Świetlik Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3218-4599

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.23471

Keywords:

open access books, open access publishing models, design thinking , scholarly publishing in Poland

Abstract

Monographs have long remained at the margins of the digital and open access (OA) transformation, particularly in Poland and across much of Europe. Unlike journal publishing, the open dissemination of scholarly books has been hindered by factors such as the additional costs of producing professional digital formats (e.g., EPUB) and the enduring perception of printed monographs as more prestigious. This has led many publishers to delay OA release until after embargo periods, limiting accessibility. The implications are particularly significant for the humanities, where monographs are often the primary research output. As a result, humanistic scholarship remains underrepresented in digital databases, reaches narrower audiences, and demonstrates lower impact as measured by dominant bibliometric indicators from major academic platforms. To address these disparities, sustainable OA publishing models tailored to monographs must be developed. This paper presents findings from a mix-method, participatory study of the Polish publishing landscape, identifying key needs, challenges, and opportunities. The study contributes to ongoing debates on open access policies and practices for monograph publishing by offering in-depth insights from one of Europe’s largest academic markets. Its design-driven and scalable research workflow represents an additional contribution, providing a methodological model that can be adapted to similar research contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Magdalena Wnuk, Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Open Science Officer, Head of Open Humanities Section, The Digital Humanities Centre of the Institute of Literary Research PAS.
Dr. Marta M. Świetlik, Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Digital Humanities Specialist, UX Researcher, Community Manager of OPERAS-PL, Member of Open Humanities Section, The Digital Humanities Centre of the Institute of Literary Research PAS.

References

Adema, J. (2019). Towards a roadmap for open access monographs: A knowledge exchange report. Knowledge Exchange. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2644997

Adema, J. (2021). Living books. Experiments in the posthumanities. MIT Press. https://livingbooks.mitpress.mit.edu/

Adema, J., & Stone, G. (2017). The surge in New University Presses and Academic-Led Publishing: An overview of a changing publishing ecology in the UK. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 27(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10210

Adema, J., Stone, G., & Keene, C. (2017). Changing publishing ecologies. A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing: A report to Jisc. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/80/

Adema, J., & Rutten, P. (2010). Digital monographs in the humanities and social sciences: Report on user needs. OAPEN. http://project.oapen.org/

ALLEA. (2022). ALLEA statement on open access publication under ‘Big Deals’ and the new copyright rules. https://doi.org/10.26356/BigDeals

Avanço, K., Balula, A., Błaszczyńska, M., Buchner, A., Caliman, L., Clivaz, C., Costa, C., Franczak, M., Gatti, R., Giglia, E., Gingold, A., Jarmelo, S., Padez, M. J., Leao, D., Maryl, M., Melinščak Zlodi, I., Mojsak, K., Morka, A., Mosterd, T., … Wieneke, L. (2021). Future of scholarly communication. Forging an inclusive and innovative research infrastructure for scholarly communication in Social Sciences and Humanities. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5017705

Bender-Salazar, R. (2023). Design thinking as an effective method for problemsetting and needfinding for entrepreneurial teams addressing wicked problems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00291-2

Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research, 37(4), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.4.191-222

Bertino, A. C., & Staines, H. (2019). Enabling a conversation across scholarly monographs through open annotation. Publications, 7(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020041

Błaszczyńska, M., & Stone, G. (2023, June 2). The growing world of open access books. Innovation Lab. https://lab.operas-eu.org/2023/06/02/the-growing-world-of-open-access-books/

Bosman, J., Frantsvag, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., & Proudman, V. (2021). OA diamond journals study. Part 1: Findings. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558704

Caulliraux, A. A., Bastos, D. P., Araujo, R., & Costa, S. R. (2020). Organizational optimization through the double diamond – Applying interdisciplinarity. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2020.025

Ciesielska, M., & Jemielniak, D. (Eds.). (2018). Qualitative methodologies in organization studies. Volume II: Methods and possibilities. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3

Collins, E., & Milloy, C. (2012). A snapshot of attitudes towards open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences – Part of the OAPEN-UK project. Insights, 25(2), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.192

Crossick, G. (2016). Monographs and open access. Insights, 29(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.280

Dam, R. F. (2025, March 13). The 5 stages in the design thinking process. The interaction design foundation. IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process

De Paoli, S., Forbes, P., Andreini, G., Maryl, M., & Błaszczyńska, M. (2024). CoDesign for discovery in Social Sciences and Humanities: Addressing the heterogeneous needs of a community in digital scholarship. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 34(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.14309

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). The landscape of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012

Ferwerda, E., Pinter, F., & Stern, N. (2017). A landscape study on open access and monographs: Policies, funding and publishing in eight European countries. Knowledge Exchange. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.815932

Ferwerda, E., Snijder, R., & Stern, N. (2023). Open access to books – The perspective of a non-profit infrastructure provider. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.3303

Forbes, P., De Paoli, S., Błaszczyńska, M., & Maryl, M. (2020). TRIPLE deliverable: D3.1 report on user needs. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3925022

Giglia, E. (2019). OPERAS: Bringing the long tail of Social Sciences and Humanities into Open Science. JLIS.It, 10(1), 140−156. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12523

Johnson, J. (2023, May 15). 20 years of building on the Double Diamond. Medium. https://medium.com/design-council/20-years-of-building-on-the-double-diamond-cc16d33cceb7

Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216

Kochanowska, M., Gagliardi, W. R., & With Reference To Jonathan Ball. (2022). The double diamond model: In pursuit of simplicity and flexibility. In D. Raposo, J. Neves, & J. Silva (Eds.), Perspectives on DESIGN II (pp. 19–32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79879-6_2

Kulczycki, E., Engels, T. C. E., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Dušková, M., Guns, R., Nowotniak, R., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G., Istenič Starčič, A., & Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 116(1), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0

Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., & Drabek, A. (2019). Internationalization of Polish journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Transformative role of the research evaluation system. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs28794

Laakso, M. (2022). Open access books through open data sources: Assessing prevalence, providers, and preservation. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7305490

Leao, D., Angelaki, M., Bertino, A., Dumouchel, S., & Vidal, F. (2018). OPERAS multilingualism white paper. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1324026

Leung, A. K.-y., & Qiu, L. (2017). Thinking through design is creative and inspiring: The why and how. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 96–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.004

Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L. J. (2018). The design thinking playbook: Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems. Wiley.

Maryl, M. (2022, March 23). Transformacja infrastrukturalna. Humanistyka cyfrowa jako wehikuł dla studiów polskich. Zjazd Polonistów 2022. https://zjazdpolonistow2022.polon.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Maryl_Transformacja-Infrastrukturalna_v1.pdf

Maryl, M., Błaszczyńska, M., Szulińska, A., Buchner, A., Wciślik, P., Zlodi, I. M., Stojanovski, J., Nury, E., Clivaz, C., Szleszyński, B., Mojsak, K., & Franczak, M. (2021). OPERAS-P deliverable D6.5: Report on the future of scholarly writing in SSH. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/4922512

Maryl, M., Błaszczyńska, M., Szulińska, A., & Rams, P. (2020). The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities. F1000Research, 9, 1265. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26545.1

Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012). Design thinking research. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research (pp. 1–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_1

MniSW. (2015). Kierunki rozwoju otwartego dostępu do publikacji i wyników badań naukowych w Polsce. https://www.gov.pl/documents/1068557/1069061/20180413_Kierunki_rozwoju_OD_wersja_ostateczna.pdf

Narodowe Centrum Nauki. (2021, October). Instrukcja. Polityka NCN dotycząca otwartego dostępu do publikacji. Narodowe Centrum Nauki. https://ncn.gov.pl/sites/default/files/pliki/2021_10_instrukcja_open_access_NCN.pdf

OPERAS PL (2023, June 1). Jak otwierać humanistykę w Polsce? Kooperacyjne modele wydawnicze dla książek naukowych w otwartym dostępie. https://operas.pl/2023/06/01/jak-otwierac-humanistyke-w-polsce-kooperacyjne-modele-wydawnicze-dla-ksiazeknaukowych-w-otwartym-dostepie/

Penier, I., Eve, M. P., & Grady, T. (2020). COPIM – Revenue models for open access monographs 2020. COPIM. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4455511

Plan S & cOAlition S. (n.d.). Making full and immediate open access a reality. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://www.coalition-s.org/

Pressman, A. (2018). Design thinking: A guide to creative problem solving for everyone (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561936

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Rosiński, C. (2024, February 22). Metadane jako klucz do szczęścia komunikacyjnego. Otwarta Humanistyka. https://otwartanauka.hypotheses.org/812

Shaw, P., Phillips, A. & Gutiérrez, M. B. (2023). The future of the monograph in the arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: Publisher perspectives on a transitioning format. Publishing Research Quarterly, 39(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09937-1

Snijder, R. (2013). Measuring monographs: A quantitative method to assess scientific impact and societal relevance. First Monday, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.4250

Snijder, R. (2016). Revisiting an open access monograph experiment: Measuring citations and tweets 5 years later. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1855–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2160-6

Stone, G., Błaszczyńska, M., Lebon, C., Morka, A., Mosterd, T., Mounier, P., Proudman, V., Speicher, L., & Melinščak Zlodi, I. (2021). Collaborative models for OA book publishers (Version 1.0) [White paper]. OPERAS. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5494731