National Repository Infrastructure and Open Access Challenges: The Croatian Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.23061Keywords:
DABAR system, national repository infrastructure, open access challenges, open science, Research visibilityAbstract
Repositories are one of the key infrastructure components in achieving the goals of open science. In response to legal obligations, emerging trends, and challenges in open science, several Croatian institutions jointly established a national digital repository infrastructure in 2015 - the DABAR system (Digital Academic Archives and Repositories). Its purpose is to provide a unified space for storing, preserving, and ensuring open access to the scholarly output of scientists and institutions within the Croatian science and higher education system.
After nearly a decade of operation, it is crucial to assess the role of this infrastructure today and evaluate whether it has successfully embodied the core principles of open science - openness, transparency, and visibility of scientific and Croatian scholarly output. This paper presents the Croatian national repository infrastructure as a case study, offering insights for comparison with similar national infrastructures.
The study employs a quantitative research approach, divided into two parts to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state and future development of repositories in Croatia. The first part analyses quantitative data and repository statistics. The DABAR infrastructure currently comprises 182 repositories and hosts over 249,000 digital objects, yet only slightly more than 50% of them are openly accessible. To investigate the reasons behind the high percentage of restricted or closed-access objects, a survey was conducted among institutions that primarily deposit such items.
The findings of this research contribute to a broader discussion on open science practices and repository management at both European and international levels. The results will serve as a foundation for further improvements to the infrastructure, the promotion of open science principles, and the development of systematic support mechanisms to encourage greater accessibility and transparency in scholarly communication.
Downloads
References
Asadi, S., Abdullah, R., Yah, Y., & Nazir, S. (2019). Understanding institutional repository in higher learning institutions: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. IEEE Access, 7, 35242–35263. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2897729
Baro, E. E., & Nwabueze-Echedom, A. U. (2022). An evaluation of institutional repository development in African universities. IFLA Journal, 49(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352221089672
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2017). Budapest Open Access Initiative – Make research publicly available. Budapestopenaccessinitiative.org. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai15/
Ćadovska, I., & Milovanović, I. (2019). Spremnost visokih učilišta za javnu objavu ocjenskih radova u repozitorijima sustava Dabar: Analiza dokumenata dostupnih na mrežnim stranicama visokih učilišta. In A. Horvat & B. Špiranec (Eds.), 15. Dani specijalnih i visokoškolskih knjižnica: Knjižnice: kamo i kako dalje? (pp. 25–36). Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
cOAlition S. (2018). cOAlition S: Making full and immediate open access a reality. cOAlition S. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://www.coalition-s.org/
COAR. (n.d). Who we are. COAR. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://coarrepositories.org/about-coar/
Digital Academic Archives and Repositories. (2021a). Coordinating Committee. Srce.hr. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://dabar.srce.hr/en/coordinating-committee
Digital Academic Archives and Repositories. (2021b). Working groups. Srce.hr. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://dabar.srce.hr/en/working-groups
Gudelj, D., Matošić, M., Poljak, L., Tomić, V., Marušić, A., & Marušić, M. (2022). Accessibility of master’s theses at SEA-EU Alliance universities in open access repositories. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 24(4), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-022-00340-3
Hadad, S., & Aharony, N. (2023). Researchers’ perceptions, patterns, motives, and challenges in self-archiving as a function of the discipline. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(2), 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221146768
Holub, K., & Jertec, L. (2018). Interoperabilnost zapisa ocjenskih radova u Dabru. Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske, 61(1), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.30754/vbh.61.1.632
Kakai, M. (2021). An analysis of the factors affecting open access to research output in institutional repositories in selected universities in East Africa. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 9(1), eP2276. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2276
Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. Portal Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039
Max Planck Society. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Max Planck Digital Library. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration
Milovanović, I. & Matijević, I. (2023). Institucijski repozitorij kao sredstvo globalne vidljivosti znanstvenih informacija – na primjeru Digitalnoga repozitorija Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. In D. Mašina Delija & K. Kalanj (Eds.), 16. dani specijalnih i visokoškolskih knjižnica: Knjižnice, osnivači, zajednica: dijalog za promjene: zbornik radova (pp. 273–288). Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:203:334704
Narodne novine. (2022). Zakon o visokom obrazovanju i znanstvenoj djelatnosti. Narodne novine, br. 119/2022. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_10_119_1834.html
OpenDOAR. (2017). About OpenDOAR – Sherpa Services. Sherpa.ac.uk. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/opendoar/about.html
Registry of Open Access Repositories. (2025). About the registry. Eprints.org. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://roar.eprints.org/information.html
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2023). Access policies in institutional digital repositories: Analysis of global trends. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 21(2), 245–269. https://ijism.isc.ac/article_703889.html
Schöpfel, J., & Prost, H. (2013). Archives institutionnelles: Observations sur un nouveau mode d’information scientifique / Institutional repositories: Observations on a new form of scientific information. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0008
Stubičan Ladešić, G., Vrkić, I., & Gašparac, P. (2022). Struktura korisnika ocjenskih radova u repozitoriju Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Knjižničarstvo, 26(1–2), 239–257. https://hrcak.srce.hr/284512
Suber, P. (2003, June 3). Bethesda statement on open access publishing. Internet Archive. Retrieved 2025, from https://web.archive.org/web/20120311105112/http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2024). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German University landscape (2010–2020): Part 2—repository-provided OA. Scientometrics, 129(5), 2801–2825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05003-5
Tmava, A. M. (2022). Faculty perceptions of open access repositories: A Qualitative Analysis. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 29(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2082991
Turk, B., Dorotić Malič, I., & Cuculić, S. (2024). Digitalna knjižnica UNIRI– potpora otvorenoj znanosti na Sveučilištu u Rijeci. Bosniaca, 29(29), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2024.29.239
WIPO. (2021). Copyright and Related Rights Act, Croatia. WIPO Lex No. HR154. Wipo. int. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/20583
Zhou, N. Y., Cheng, N. C., & Han, N. Y. (2025). Understanding new dimensions of user perceptions of information communication and open access repositories in academic research in developing countries. El Profesional de La Informacion, 33(6), e330614. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2024.ene.0614
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ivana Matijević, Ivona Milovanović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
