Attitudes towards Open Access Books in the European Research Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.21719Keywords:
open access books, open access policies, OA booksAbstract
This paper examines the challenges and opportunities of publishing Open Access (OA) books within the European Research Area (ERA), drawing on data collected through the PALOMERA project. Despite the growing interest in OA books, the landscape remains fragmented due to a lack of clear policies. National policies are often sparse, with institutional and funder mandates typically focused on journal articles rather than monographs. An issue also highlighted is the marginalisation of non-English language works, which receive significantly less visibility than English-language publications. Additionally, the perceived prestige of OA monographs remains a concern, with some scholars viewing them as less reputable than traditionally published works. This paper synthesises findings from 42 in-depth interviews to offer an overview of the current state of OA book publishing in Europe. It identifies areas for policy improvement to foster a more inclusive and sustainable OA landscape.
Downloads
References
Adema, J. (2019). Towards a Roadmap for Open Access Monographs: A Knowledge Exchange Report [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2644997
Adema, J. (2021). Living Books. Experiments in the Posthumanities. The MIT Press. https://livingbooks.mitpress.mit.edu/
Avanço, K., Balula, A., Błaszczyńska, M., Buchner, A., Caliman, L., Clivaz, C., Costa, C., Franczak, M., Gatti, R., Giglia, E., Gingold, A., Jarmelo, S., Padez, M. J., Leão, D., Maryl, M., Melinščak Zlodi, I., Mojsak, K., Morka, A., Mosterd, T., … Wieneke, L. (2021). Future of Scholarly Communication. Forging an inclusive and innovative research infrastructure for scholarly communication in Social Sciences and Humanities [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5017705
Azadbakht, E., Radniecki, T., Schultz, T. A., & Shannon, A. (2023). Do Open Access Mandates Work? A Systematized Review of the Literature on Open Access Publishing Rates. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 11(1), Article eP15444. https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.15444
Bandura- Morgan, L., Bazeliuk, N., Davidson, A., Dreyer, M., Caliman Fontes, L., Fernandes Especiosa, M. O., Ferreira, N. H., Gatti, R., Gouzi, F., Iannace, D. E., Laakso, M., Leão, D., Manista, F., Manista, G., Maryl, M., Mounier, P., Paltineanu, S., Papp Le Roy, N., Proudman, V., … Vrčon, A. (2024). PALOMERA Deliverable 4.2 - The PALOMERA Recommendations for Open Access Books. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14330411
Błaszczyńska, M., Melinščak Zlodi, I., Morka, A., Proudman, V., & Stone, G. (2023). Collaborative models for OA book publishers (Version 2.0) [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7780754
Bryan, K. A., & Ozcan, Y. (2021). The Impact of Open Access Mandates on Invention. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(5), 954–967. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00926
Burgelman, J.-C., Pascu, C., Szkuta, K., Von Schomberg, R., Karalopoulos, A., Repanas, K., & Schouppe, M. (2019). Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century. Frontiers in Big Data, 2, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02077.x
Café, L. C., Cavalcanti, V. O. D. M., Barros, C. M. D., Vital, L. P., & Bisset Alvarez, E. (2022). Domain analysis of Brazilian open access institutional policies. RDBCI Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência Da Informação, 20, Article e022020. https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670092
Collins, E., & Milloy, C. (2012). A snapshot of attitudes towards open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences – part of the OAPEN-UK project. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 25(2), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.192
Crossick, G. (2016). Monographs and Open Access. Insights, 29(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.280
Dagienė, E. (2023). Prestige of scholarly book publishers—An investigation into criteria, processes, and practices across countries. Research Evaluation, 32 (2), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac044
Drach, I., Popovych, M., Polishyk, O., & Polishchuk, O. (2022). Global cooperation in Open Science policies and procedures to ensure the sustainable development of society. SHS Web of Conferences, 141, Article 01023. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214101023
Dreyer, M., Stone, G., Tummes, J.-P., Pogačnik, A., Varachkina, H., Bandura Morgan, L., Păltineanu, S., Proudman, V., Redhead, C., Manista, G., Laakso, M., Frances, P., Gaillard, V., Maryl, M., Saenen, B., Kingsley, D., Silva Ferreira, N. H., & Stern, N. (2024a). Questionnaire of the PALOMERA Survey on Open Access Book Policies (2 .0). Zenodo. https://10.5281/zenodo.13607260
Dreyer, M., Tummes, J.-P., & Graham, S. (2024b). PALOMERA ERA Wide Survey Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13641415.
Dreyer, M., Stone, G., Tummes, J.-P., Gingold, A., Iannace, D. E., Pogačnik, A., Varachinka, H., Bandura-Morgan, L., Barnes, L., Laakso, M., Manista, G., Mounier, P., Păltineanu, S., Proudman, V., Redhead, C., & Rooryck, J. (2024c). Report on the PALOMERA survey on open access policies for books in the European research area [Other]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13607261
Eve, M. P. (2014). Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies And The Future. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012
Fathallah, J. (2022). Open Access Monographs: Myths, Truths and Implications in the Wake of UKRI Open Access Policy. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 32(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.11068
Ferwerda, Eelco, Frances Pinter, & Niels Stern. 2017. A Landscape Study On Open Access And Monographs: Policies, Funding And Publishing In Eight European Countries (1.0) [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi:10.5281/ZENODO.815932
Ferwerda, E., Mosterd, T., Snijder, R., & Mounier, P. (2021). UKRI Gap Analysis of Open Access Monographs Infrastructure [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5771945
Frankl, J. (2023). Towards an Author-Centered Open Access Monograph Program: Understanding Open Access Cultures in Scholarly Publishing. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.3332
Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling Academic Publishing: A History of the Relationship between Commercial Interests, Academic Prestige and the Circulation of Research [Report]. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/546100#.WgRImFVl9yw
Hadad, S., Aharony, N., & Raban, D. R. (2023). Funding or Policy? Which Promotes Open Access Publication? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 965–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.913
Kivistö, S., & Pihlström, S. (2015). The monograph—An old-fashioned publication forum or an ultimate scholarly achievement? University of Helsinki.
Koley, M., & Lala, K. (2022). Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India’s open access policy? Learned Publishing, 35(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1441
Laakso, Mikael. 2022. Open access books through open data sources: Assessing prevalence, providers, and preservation (1.0) [Preprint]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7305477
Laakso, M. (2023). Open access books through open data sources: Assessing prevalence, providers, and preservation. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 157-177.. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2023-0016
Laakso, M., Bandura-Morgan, L., Bazeliuk, N., Davidson, A., Dreyer, M., Iannace, D. E., Manista, G., Maciej, M., Matthias, L., Ozkan, O., Proudman, V., Păltineanu, S., da Silva Ferreira, N. H., Stone, G., Tummes, J.-P., Wnuk, M., & Varachina, H. (2024). PALOMERA Deliverable 3.1 – Report on Analysis Findings (1.1) [Publication]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13827251
Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think. Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054158
Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368
Manco, A. (2022). A Landscape of Open Science Policies Research. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221140358
Maryl, M., Błaszczyńska, M., Szulińska, A., Buchner, A., Wciślik, P., Zlodi, I. M., Stojanovski, J., Nury, E., Clivaz, C., Szleszyński, B., Mojsak, K., & Franczak, M. (2021). OPERAS-P Deliverable D6.5: Report on the future of scholarly writing in SSH (Version DRAFT) [Project deliverable]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4922512
Maryl, M., Manista, G., Păltineanu, S., Stone, G., Laakso, M., Dryer, M., Bandura-Morgan, L., Davidson, A., Silva Ferreira, N. H., Snijder, R., Tummes, J.-P., & Varachkina, H. (2024). PALOMERA D2.1 Report on Compiling the Knowledge Base [Project deliverable]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10777132
Moore, S., Neylon, C., Paul Eve, M., Paul O’Donnell, D., & Pattinson, D. (2017). “Excellence R Us”: University Research and the Fetishisation of Excellence. Palgrave Communications, 3, Article 16105. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.105
Moradi, S., & Abdi, S. (2023). Open science–related policies in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 50(3), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac082
OAPEN Open Access Books Toolkit. (2020, June 29). Common myths about open access.. https://oabooks-toolkit.org/article/13606437-common-myths-about-open-acces
Penier, I., Eve, M. P., & Grady, T. (2020). COPIM – Revenue Models for Open Access Monographs 2020 [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4011836
Potvin, S., & Arant-Kaspar, W. (2023). A Critical Survey of Open-Access Policies in US Land Grants. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 11(1), Article eP15605. https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.15605
Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2020). Open Access uptake by universities worldwide. PeerJ, 8, Article e9410. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9410
Shaw, P., Phillips, A., & Gutiérrez, M. B. (2023). The Future of the Monograph in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: Publisher Perspectives on a Transitioning Format. Publishing Research Quarterly 39, 69 – 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09937-1
Snijder, R. (2013a). Measuring monographs: A quantitative method to assess scientific impact and societal relevance. First Monday, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.4250
Snijder, R. (2013b). Do developing countries profit from free books?: Discovery and online usage in developed and developing countries compared. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0016.103
Snijder, R. (2015). Better Sharing Through Licenses? Measuring the Influence of Creative Commons Licenses on the Usage of Open Access Monographs. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), Article eP1187. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1187
Snijder, R. (2022). Big in Japan, Zimbabwe or Brazil – global reach and national preferences for open access books. Insights, 35(11), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.580
Stern, N., Gouzi, F., Stone, G., Rooryck, J., Dreyer, M., Laakso, M., Da Silva Ferreira, N. H., Rabar, U., & Proudman, V. (2024). D4.4 – PALOMERA 2nd Policy Brief [Project deliverable]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14557420
Suhendra, M. F., & Laksmi, L. (2022). Policy of providing open-access e-books at LIPI during the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 10(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v10i2.36260
Terán, O., & Dávila, J. (2023). Simulating and Contrasting the Game of Open Access in Diverse Cultural Contexts: A Social Simulation Model. Publications, 11(3), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030040
Vincent-Lamarre, P., Boivin, J., Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., & Harnad, S. (2016). Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The MELIBEA score. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2815–2828. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23601
Wenaas, L., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2022). The green, gold grass of home: Introducing open access in universities in Norway. PLOS ONE, 17(8), Article e0273091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273091
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriela Manista, Maciej Maryl, Magdalena Wnuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
