Data as a new research publication type: What could be the role of research libraries as service providers?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.19415Keywords:
data publications, data publishing, research libraries, research supportAbstract
This article examines the evolving role of research libraries in supporting the recognition of datasets as legitimate academic outputs through data publishing. Although the academic community increasingly acknowledges the value of treating research data as standalone contributions, there remains a lack of comprehensive frameworks and services to support this shift. Research libraries are well-positioned to lead in data curation and publication by collaborating with researchers, institutions, and other stakeholders.
Using a qualitative, multi-method approach—including a literature review, an exploratory survey of university libraries in the Nordic and Baltic countries, and professional experience—we investigate current practices, challenges, and institutional perspectives on data publishing. Our findings highlight inconsistent terminology in data policies and evolving services for data appraisal and visibility. We differentiate data publishing from general data sharing, emphasizing critical aspects such as data citability, quality control, and ethical reuse.
The article discusses various publishing pathways—such as data journals, repositories, and article supplements—and their respective implications. We identify key service gaps in libraries, particularly in data evaluation and discoverability, and propose strategies for libraries to promote data journals and domain-specific repositories. Ultimately, we advocate for libraries to expand their role by developing integrated services for data appraisal, curation, and preservation, and by strengthening staff competencies in data management. Such efforts are essential for increasing the visibility, credibility, and scholarly impact of research data.
This paper is a continuation to a presentation provided in Liber Conference 2022. The presentation paper was acknowledged with the Innovation Award.
Downloads
References
Alaterä, T., Kleemola, M., Ala-Lahti, H., & Jerlehag, B. (2022). D4.5 Report on completed FAIR data standard adoption and certifications of data repositories in the region [Project delivery]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7303538
Albani, M., Maggio, I., & Ceos Data Stewardship Interest Group. (2020). Long-Term Data Preservation Data Lifecycle, Standardisation Process, Implementation and Lessons Learned. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.715 ok
Austin, C. C., Bloom, T., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Khodiyar, V. K., Murphy, F., Nurnberger, A., Raymond, L., Stockhause, M., Tedds, J., Vardigan, M., & Whyte, A. (2017). Key components of data publishing: Using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2
Ayris, P., Bernal, I., Cavalli, V., Dorch, B., Frey, J., Hallik, M., Hormia-Poutanen, K., Labastida, I., MacColl, J., Ponsati Obiols, A., Sacchi, S., Scholze, F., Schmidt, B., Smit, A., Sofronijevic, A., Stojanovski, J., Svoboda, M., Tsakonas, G., van Otegem, M., Verheusen, A., Vilks, A., Widmark, W. & Horstmann, W. (2018). Liber Open Science Roadmap. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1303002
Callaghan, S., Donegan, S., Pepler, S., Thorley, M., Cunningham, N., Kirsch, P., Ault, L., Bell, P., Bowie, R., Leadbetter, A., Lowry, R., Moncoiffé, G., Harrison, K., Smith-Haddon, B., Weatherby, A., & Wright, D. (2012). Making Data a First Class Scientific Output: Data Citation and Publication by NERC’s Environmental Data Centres. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.218
CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices. (2013). Out of Cite, Out of Mind: The Current State of Practice, Policy, and Technology for the Citation of Data. Data Science Journal, 12(0), CIDCR1–CIDCR75. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043
CoreTrustSeal Standards and Certification Board. (2022). CoreTrustSeal Requirements 2023-2025 (Version V01.00). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7051012
Janesick, V. J. (2000). The Choreography of Qualitative Research Design: Minuets, Improvisations, and Crystallization. In: N. K. Denzin, K. Norman & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379-399). Sage.
Johnston, L. R., Curty, R., Braxton, S. M., Carlson, J., Hadley, H., Lafferty-Hess, S., Luong, H., Petters, J. L., & Kozlowski, W. A. (2024). Understanding the value of curation: A survey of US data repository curation practices and perceptions. PLOS ONE, 19(6), Article e0301171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301171
Klump, J., Bertelmann, R., Brase, J., Diepenbroek, M., Grobe, H., Höck, H., Lautenschlager, M., Schindler, U., Sens, I., & Wächter, J. (2006). Data publication in the open access initiative. Data Science Journal, 5, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.5.79
Kuusniemi, M. E., & Nykyri, S. (2022, July 6-8). Data as a new research publication type: What could be the role of research libraries as service providers? [Conference presentation] 55th LIBER Annual Conference (Odense, Denmark. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6812223
Kuusniemi, M. E., & Nykyri, S. (2025a). Dataset for the study Research Data Publication Services Provided by University Libraries in the Nordic and Baltic Countries [Data set]. University of Helsinki & Tampere University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15434405
Kuusniemi, M. E., & Nykyri, S. (2025b). Survey form for the study Research Data Publication Services Provided by University Libraries in the Nordic and Baltic Countries (1.0) [Data set]. University of Helsinki & Tampere University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15433857
Labadie, C., Legner, C., Eurich, M., & Fadler, M. (2020). FAIR Enough? Enhancing the Usage of Enterprise Data with Data Catalogs. 2020 IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI49978.2020.00029
Lawrence, B., Jones, C., Matthews, B., Pepler, S., & Callaghan, S. (2011). Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 4–37. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205
Lee, D. J., & Stvilia, B. (2017). Practices of research data curation in institutional repositories: A qualitative view from repository staff. PLOS ONE, 12(3), Article e0173987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173987
Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), Article 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
Mayernik, M. S., Callaghan, S., Leigh, R., Tedds, J., & Worley, S. (2015). Peer Review of Datasets: When, Why, and How. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00083.1
McGillivray, B., Marongiu, P., Pedrazzini, N., Ribary, M., Wigdorowitz, M., & Zordan, E. (2022). Deep Impact: A Study on the Impact of Data Papers and Datasets in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Publications, 10(4), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10040039
Meerman, B., Gaiarin, S. P., & Gallas, S. M. (2021). EOSC-NORDIC FAIRification study testing F-UJI (Version 1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5226082
Open Science Coordination in Finland, Federation of Finnish Learned Societies. (2023). Open research data and methods. National policy and executive plan by the higher education and research community for 2021–2025: Policy component 1 (Open access to research data) and 2 (Open access to research methods and infrastructures). The Committee for Public Information (TJNK) and Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (TSV). https://doi.org/10.23847/tsv.669
PwC EU Services. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis for FAIR research data : cost of not having FAIR research data. European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/02999.
National Information Standards Organization. (2023). ANSI/NISO Z39.106-2023, Standard Terminology for Peer Review. https://doi.org/10.3789/ansi.niso.z39.106-2023
OECD & Science Europe. (2020). Optimising the operation and use of national research infrastructures. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 91. https://doi.org/10.1787/7cc876f7-en
Publications Office of the European Union. (2022). Data citation: A guide to best practice. Eurpean Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2830/59387
Publications Office of the European Union. (2021). Data.europa.eu data quality guidelines. Eurpean Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2830/79367.
Parsons, M. A., & Fox, P. A. (2013). Is Data Publication the Right Metaphor? Data Science Journal, 12, WDS32–WDS46. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.WDS-042
Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2015). Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications. BMC Bioinformatics, 16(1), Article 237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0668-z
Rantasaari, J. (2022). Multi-Stakeholder Research Data Management Training as a Tool to Improve the Quality, Integrity, Reliability and Reproducibility of Research. LIBER Quarterly, 32(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.11726
Rieger, O. Y. (2007). Select for Success: Key Principles in Assessing Repository Models. D-Lib Magazine, 13(7/8). https://doi.org/10.1045/july2007-rieger
Kuusniemi, M. E., & Moisio, M. (2024), Advancing RDM Careers: A Framework for Expert Education in Finland. National Open. Roadmap for professional qualification of data management experts working group. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10815480
Rumsey, S., & Jefferies, N. (2013). Challenges in Building an Institutional Research Data Catalogue. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.284
Schmidt, B., Chiarelli, A., Loffreda, L., & Sondervan, J. (2023). Emerging roles and responsibilities of libraries in support of reproducible research. LIBER Quarterly, 33(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.14947
Seale Clive (ed.) (1998). Researching Society and Culture. SAGE Publications.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. SAGE Publications.
UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. . https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546
Whyte, A. (2016, January 22). Where to keep research data: Version 1.1 of the DCC checklist for evaluating data repositories. DCC How-to Guides. https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides/where-keep-research-data
Whyte, A. & Wilson, A. (2010). How to Appraise and Select Research Data for Curation. DCC How-to Guides.https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides/appraise-select-data
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mari Elisa Kuusniemi, Susanna Nykyri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
