Arguillas, F., Christian, T.-M., Gooch, M., Honeyman, T., & Peer, L. (2022). 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research (Version 1.1). Research Data Alliance. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00074

Association of Research Libraries (ARL). (2022). ARL’s 2023-2026 Action Plan. https://www.arl.org/who-we-are/#section-action-plan

Chassanoff, A., AlNoamany, Y., Thornton, K., & Borghi, J. (2018). Software curation in research libraries: Practice and promise. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(1), Article eP2239. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2239

Chiarelli, A., Loffreda, L., & Johnson, R. (2021a, April 8). Publishing reproducible research outputs - Literature findings. [Conference presentation]. Literature findings. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4675457

Chiarelli, A., Loffreda, L., & Johnson, R. (2021b). The Art of Publishing Reproducible Research Outputs: Supporting emerging practices through cultural and technological innovation. Knowledge Exchange. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5521077

Coalition on Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). (2022). Agreement on reforming research assessment. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/

Council of the European Union. (2022). Research assessment and implementation of Open Science. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/56958/st10126-en22.pdf

Council of the European Union. (2023). High-quality, transparent, open, trustworthy and equitable scholarly publishing. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9616-2023-INIT/en/pdf

Diaba-Nuhoho, P., & Amponsah-Offeh, M. (2021). Reproducibility and research integrity: The role of scientists and institutions. BMC Research Notes, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05875-3

European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2021). Towards a reform of the research assessment system: Scoping report. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/707440

European Commission. (2022a). Assessing the reproducibility of research results in EU Framework Programmes for Research: Final report. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/186782

European Commission. (2022b). Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/935288

Frey, J., Roche, J., Kautonen, H., Schmidt, B., Tsakonas, G., van Wijngaarden, H., Smit, A., Cassafieres, C. S., Burman, L., Verheusen, A., Knigge, R., Joss-Bethlehem, E., & van der Graaf, M. (2023). LIBER Strategy 2023-2027. LIBER. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7696568

Hettne, K., Proppert, R. K. K., Nab, L., Saunero, L. P. R., & Gawehns, D. (2020). ReprohackNL 2019: How libraries can promote research reproducibility through community engagement. SocArXiv Papers. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6f4zv

Konkol, M., Nüst, D., & Goulier, L. (2020). Publishing computational research—A review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00095-y

KNAW. (2018). Replication studies – Improving reproducibility in the empirical sciences. Amsterdam, KNAW.

LaPolla, F. W. Z., Bakker, C. J., Exner, N., Montnech, T., Surkis, A., & Ye, H. (2022). Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1443

Lasser, J. (2020). Creating an executable paper is a journey through Open Science. Communications Physics, 143(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00403-4

Library Publishing Coalition Ethical Framework Task Force. (2023). An Ethical Framework for Library Publishing, Version 2.0. Library Publishing Coalition https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317619

Loffreda, L., & Chiarelli, A. (2021). Publishing Reproducible Research Outputs—Literature sources and Thematic coding (Version 1) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4748748

Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The emerging third dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113

Martinez-Lavanchy, P. M., van Schöll, P., & Zormpa, E. (2022). TU Delft Research Data Management 101 course. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6325919

Martinez-Ortiz, C., Martinez Lavanchy, P., Sesink, L., Olivier, B. G., Meakin, J., de Jong, M., & Cruz, M. (2023). Practical guide to Software Management Plans (Version 1.1). Netherlands eScience Center and NOW. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7589725

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2018). Open science by design: Realizing a vision for 21st century research. https://doi.org/10.17226/25116

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in science. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303

National Institutes of Health. (2014). Principles and guidelines for reporting preclinical research. https://grants.nih.gov/policy/reproducibility/principles-guidelines-reporting-preclinical-research.htm

Neylon, C., Belsø, R., Bijsterbosch, M., Cordewener, B., Foncel, J., Friesike, S., Fyfe, A., Jacobs, N., Katerbow, M., Laakso, M., & Sesink, L. (2019). Open Scholarship and the need for collective action. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3454688

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck S., Chambers, C., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D., Hesse, A., Humphreys, M., … Boycan, E. (2023, September 9). Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines. https://osf.io/9f6gx

Oliver, J. C., Kollen, C., Hickson, B., & Rios, F. (2019). Data science support at the academic library. Journal of Library Administration, 59(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1583015

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 943. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Packer, E. (2020, August 24). ELife launches Executable Research Articles for publishing computationally reproducible results. eLife. https://elifesciences.org/for-the-press/eb096af1/elife-launches-executable-research-articles-for-publishing-computationally-reproducible-results

Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahim, O. N., Govaart, G. H., Norris, E., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., Todorovic, A., Pennington, C. R., Garcia-Pelegrin, E., Lazić,A., Robertson, O., Middleton, S. L., Valentini, B., McCuaig, J., Baker, B. J., Collins, E., … & Aczel, B. (2022). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4

Quan, J. (2021). Toward reproducibility: Academic libraries and open science. In J. Herndon, (Ed.), Data science in the library: Tools and strategies for supporting data-driven research and instruction (pp. 49–66). Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783304615.004

Rahal, R.-M., Hamann, H., Brohmer, H., & Pethig, F. (2022). Sharing the recipe: Reproducibility and replicability in research across disciplines. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 8, Article e89980. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e89980

Rethlefsen, M. L., Lackey, M. J., & Zhao, S. (2018). Building capacity to encourage research reproducibility and #MakeResearchTrue. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.273

Ross-Hellauer, T., Klebel, T., Bannach-Brown, A., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Jabeen, H., Manola, N., Metodiev, T., Papageorgiou, H., Reczko, M., Sansone, S.-A., Schneider, J., Tijdink, J., & Vergoulis, T. (2022). TIER2: enhancing trust, integrity and efficiency in research through next-level reproducibility. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 8, Article e98457 https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e98457

Sayre, F., & Riegelman, A. (2019). Replicable services for reproducible research: A model for academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 80(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.2.260

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2018). Reproducibility of scientific results. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility/

Steeves, V. (2017). Reproducibility librarianship. Collaborative Librarianship, 9(2), 80–89. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol9/iss2/4

Sumner, J., Haynes, L., Nathan, S., Hudson-Vitale, C., & McIntosh, L. D. (2020). Reproducibility and reporting practices in COVID-19 preprint manuscripts. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042796

The Turing Way Community. (2022). The Turing Way: A handbook for reproducible, ethical and collaborative research (1.0.2). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7625728

Tsang, E., & Maciocci, G. (2020, August 24). Welcome to a new ERA of reproducible publishing. ELife. https://elifesciences.org/labs/dc5acbde/welcome-to-a-new-era-of-reproducible-publishing

Wellcome Trust (2017, July 10). Data, software and materials management and sharing policy. https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/data-software-materials-management-and-sharing-policy

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18