American Library Association. (2021a). Privacy. Retrieved May 8, 2023, from

American Library Association. (2021b, January 26). Resolution on the misuse of behavioural data surveillance in libraries.

Andrews, P. C. S. (2020). The platformization of open. In M. P. Eve (Ed.), Reassembling scholarly communications (pp. 265–276). The MIT Press.

Beigel, F. (2021). A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 1–16.

Bhosale, U. (2022, January 14). 2021 STM Report: Global Research Trends and Transformation in Open Access Publishing. Enago academy.

Biagioli, M., & Lippman, A. (2020). Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. The MIT Press.

Blair, A. M. (2010). Too much to know: Managing scholarly information before the modern age. Yale University Press.

Brembs, B., Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Susi, T., Siems, R., Perakakis, P., Trachana, V., Ma, L., & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2021). Replacing Academic Journals [Journal article]. Zenodo.

Chen, G., Posada, A., & Chan, L. (2019). Vertical integration in academic publishing. In L. Chan & P. Mounier (Eds.), Connecting the knowledge commons—From projects to sustainable infrastructure. OpenEdition Press.

CILIP. (2018, October 25). CILIP’s Ethical Framework.

Crawford, W. (2021). Gold Open Access 2015–2020: Articles in Journals (GOA6). Cites and Insights Books.

Csiszar, A. (2018). The scientific journal: Authorship and the politics of knowledge in the nineteenth century. The University of Chicago Press.

Demeter, M., & Toth, T. (2020). The world-systemic network of global elite sociology: the western male monoculture at faculties of the top one-hundred sociology departments of the world. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2469–2495.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2021, October 28). Data tracking in research: aggregation and use or sale of usage data by academic publishers. A briefing paper of the Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [Report]. Zenodo.

Else, H. (2021). Row erupts over university’s use of research metrics in job-cut decisions. Nature, 592, 19.

Fried, E. (2022, May 9). Welcome to Hotel Elsevier: you can check-out any time you like … not. Measurement, modelling & complexity of mental health.

Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017, May 25). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research [Report]. Zenodo. http://doi.Org/10.5281/zenodo.546100

Giblin, R., & Doctorow, C. (2022). Chokepoint capitalism. Scribe.

Goudarzi, S., Pugh, K., Rhinesmith, V., Staines, H., & Thaney, K. (2021, August 1). Designing a preparedness model for the future of open scholarship [Report]. Zenodo.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2012). IFLA Code of Ethics for Librarians and other Information Workers (full version). Retrieved May 8, 2023, from

Johnson, R. (2022). Operationalising Open Research Europe as a collective publishing enterprise. European Commission.

Laakso, M., Matthias, L., & Jahn, N. (2021). Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(9), 1099–1112.

Lamdan, S. (2023). Data cartels: The companies that control and monopolize our information. Stanford University Press.

Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C.R. (2019). The journal impact factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer Cham.

Lewis, D. W. (2017, September 11). The 2.5% commitment [Report]. IUPUI ScholarWorks Repository.

Lewis, D. W., Goetsch, L., Graves, D., & Roy, M. (2018). Funding community controlled open infrastructure for scholarly communication: The 2.5% commitment initiative. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 133.

Library Association of Ireland. (2022, September 20). Irish Librarians condemn publisher Wiley’s removal of hundreds of titles from ebook collections.

Ma, L. (2022). Metrics and epistemic injustice. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 392–404.

Ma, L. (2023). Information, platformized. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(2), 273–282.

Ma, L., & Ladisch, M. (2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 209–217.

Mills, D., Branford, A., Inouye, K., Robinson, N., & Kingori, P. (2021). “Fake” journals and the fragility of authenticity: Citation indexes, “predatory” publishing, and the African research ecosystem. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 33(3), 276–296. <

Morais, R., Stoy, L., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2019, May 13). 2019 Big Deals Report: An Updated Mapping of Major Scholarly Publishing Contracts in Europe. European University Association.

Müller, R., & de Rijcke, S. (2017). Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences. Research Evaluation, 26(3), 157–168.

Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292.

Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4).

Pollock, D. (2022, March 14). News & views: Open access charges–continued consolidation and increases. Delta Think.

Pooley, J. (2022). Surveillance publishing. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(1).

Stoy, L., Morais, R., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2019, October 24). Decrypting the Big Deal Landscape: Follow-up of the 2019 EUA Big Deals Survey Report. European University Association.

Verbeke, D., & Mesotten, L. (2022). Library funding for open access at KU Leuven. Insights, 35(1).

Wang, J. (2022). Knowledge, state power, and the invention of international science. In J. Krige (Ed.), Knowledge flows in a global age: A transnational approach (pp. 31–73). University of Chicago Press.

Wellcome. (2020). What Researchers Think About the Culture They Work In.

Williamson, B. (2021). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50–66.

Wood, D. M. (2015). Spies in the information economy: Academic publishers and the trade in personal information. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 8(3), 484–493.