References

American Library Association. (2021a). Privacy. Retrieved May 8, 2023, from https://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacy

American Library Association. (2021b, January 26). Resolution on the misuse of behavioural data surveillance in libraries. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/datasurveillanceresolution

Andrews, P. C. S. (2020). The platformization of open. In M. P. Eve (Ed.), Reassembling scholarly communications (pp. 265–276). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0027

Beigel, F. (2021). A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1845923

Bhosale, U. (2022, January 14). 2021 STM Report: Global Research Trends and Transformation in Open Access Publishing. Enago academy.https://www.enago.com/academy/2021-stm-report-global-research-trends/

Biagioli, M., & Lippman, A. (2020). Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. The MIT Press.

Blair, A. M. (2010). Too much to know: Managing scholarly information before the modern age. Yale University Press.

Brembs, B., Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Susi, T., Siems, R., Perakakis, P., Trachana, V., Ma, L., & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2021). Replacing Academic Journals [Journal article]. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/5526635

Chen, G., Posada, A., & Chan, L. (2019). Vertical integration in academic publishing. In L. Chan & P. Mounier (Eds.), Connecting the knowledge commons—From projects to sustainable infrastructure. OpenEdition Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep.9068

CILIP. (2018, October 25). CILIP’s Ethical Framework. https://www.cilip.org.uk/page/CILIPEthicsreview

Crawford, W. (2021). Gold Open Access 2015–2020: Articles in Journals (GOA6). Cites and Insights Books.

Csiszar, A. (2018). The scientific journal: Authorship and the politics of knowledge in the nineteenth century. The University of Chicago Press.

Demeter, M., & Toth, T. (2020). The world-systemic network of global elite sociology: the western male monoculture at faculties of the top one-hundred sociology departments of the world. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2469–2495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03563-w

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2021, October 28). Data tracking in research: aggregation and use or sale of usage data by academic publishers. A briefing paper of the Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5937995

Else, H. (2021). Row erupts over university’s use of research metrics in job-cut decisions. Nature, 592, 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00793-7

Fried, E. (2022, May 9). Welcome to Hotel Elsevier: you can check-out any time you like … not. Measurement, modelling & complexity of mental health. https://eiko-fried.com/welcome-to-hotel-elsevier-you-can-check-out-any-time-you-like-not/

Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017, May 25). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research [Report]. Zenodo. http://doi.Org/10.5281/zenodo.546100

Giblin, R., & Doctorow, C. (2022). Chokepoint capitalism. Scribe.

Goudarzi, S., Pugh, K., Rhinesmith, V., Staines, H., & Thaney, K. (2021, August 1). Designing a preparedness model for the future of open scholarship [Report]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5151774

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2012). IFLA Code of Ethics for Librarians and other Information Workers (full version). Retrieved May 8, 2023, from https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-code-of-ethics-for-librarians-and-other-information-workers-full-version/

Johnson, R. (2022). Operationalising Open Research Europe as a collective publishing enterprise. European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/061886

Laakso, M., Matthias, L., & Jahn, N. (2021). Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(9), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24460

Lamdan, S. (2023). Data cartels: The companies that control and monopolize our information. Stanford University Press.

Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C.R. (2019). The journal impact factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_1

Lewis, D. W. (2017, September 11). The 2.5% commitment [Report]. IUPUI ScholarWorks Repository. http://doi.org/10.7912/C2JD29

Lewis, D. W., Goetsch, L., Graves, D., & Roy, M. (2018). Funding community controlled open infrastructure for scholarly communication: The 2.5% commitment initiative. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.3.133

Library Association of Ireland. (2022, September 20). Irish Librarians condemn publisher Wiley’s removal of hundreds of titles from ebook collections. https://www.libraryassociation.ie/irish-librarians-condemn-publisher-wileys-removal-of-hundreds-of-titles-from-ebook-collections/

Ma, L. (2022). Metrics and epistemic injustice. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0240

Ma, L. (2023). Information, platformized. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24713

Ma, L., & Ladisch, M. (2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz008

Mills, D., Branford, A., Inouye, K., Robinson, N., & Kingori, P. (2021). “Fake” journals and the fragility of authenticity: Citation indexes, “predatory” publishing, and the African research ecosystem. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 33(3), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2020.1864304 <

Morais, R., Stoy, L., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2019, May 13). 2019 Big Deals Report: An Updated Mapping of Major Scholarly Publishing Contracts in Europe. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/829:2019-big-deals-survey-report.html

Müller, R., & de Rijcke, S. (2017). Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences. Research Evaluation, 26(3), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx023

Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694

Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425

Pollock, D. (2022, March 14). News & views: Open access charges–continued consolidation and increases. Delta Think. https://deltathink.com/news-views-open-access-charges-continued-consolidation-and-increases/

Pooley, J. (2022). Surveillance publishing. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.1874

Stoy, L., Morais, R., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2019, October 24). Decrypting the Big Deal Landscape: Follow-up of the 2019 EUA Big Deals Survey Report. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/889:decrypting-the-big-deal-landscape.html

Verbeke, D., & Mesotten, L. (2022). Library funding for open access at KU Leuven. Insights, 35(1). http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.565

Wang, J. (2022). Knowledge, state power, and the invention of international science. In J. Krige (Ed.), Knowledge flows in a global age: A transnational approach (pp. 31–73). University of Chicago Press.

Wellcome. (2020). What Researchers Think About the Culture They Work In. https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdf

Williamson, B. (2021). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556

Wood, D. M. (2015). Spies in the information economy: Academic publishers and the trade in personal information. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 8(3), 484–493. https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/846