Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alter, S. (2017). Nothing is more practical than a good conceptual artifact … which may be a theory, framework, model, metaphor, paradigm or perhaps some other abstraction. Information Systems Journal, 27(5), 671–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12116

Aluri, R. (1981). Application of learning theories to library - Use instruction. Libri, 31(1981), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.140

Babbie, E. (1992). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.

Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320

Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1043::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-X

Bates. M. J. (2006). An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. In K. Fisher, S. Erdelez. & E. F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior: A researcher’s guide (pp. 1–24). Information Today.

Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017–1041. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41409971

Benoit, G. (2007). Critical theory and the legitimation of LIS. Information Research, 12(4). https://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis30.html

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. Global Text Project. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3

Booth, A., & Carroll, C. (2015). Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: Is it feasible? Is it desirable? Health Information and Libraries Journal, 32(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12108

Bossaler, J., Adkins, D., & Thompson, K. M. (2010). Critical theory, libraries and culture. Progressive Librarian, (34/35), 25–38. http://www.progressivelibrariansguild.org/PL/PL34_35/025.pdf

Boyce, B. R., & Kraft, D. H. (1985). Principles and theories in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 20, 153–178.

Brookes, B. C. (1980). The foundations of information science Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2(3/4), 125–133.

Buckland, M. K. (2003). Five grand challenges for library research. Library Trends, 57(4), 675–686.

Buckland, M. (1991). Information and information systems. Greenwood Press.

Chatman, E. A. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199603)47:3<193::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-T

Chatman, E. A. (1999) A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 50(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:3<207::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-8

Chijioke, O. C., Ikechukwu, A., & Aloysius, A. (2021). Understanding theory in social science research: Public administration in perspective. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963153

Cole, C. (2011). A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1216–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21541

Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.55662499

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. SAGE.

Cunningham, G. B. (2013). Theory and theory development in sport management. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2012.01.006

Dankasa, J. (2015). Developing a theory in academic research: A review of experts’ advice. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(3), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.3.4

Davies, P., Walker, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implementation Science, 5(14), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-14

Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX, USA.

Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36–46.

De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouché, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2005). Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed.). Van Schaik.

Dillon, A. (2007). LIS as a research domain: Problems and prospects. Information Research, 12(4). https://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis03.html

Doherty, A. (2012). Investing in sport management: The value of good theory. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.006

dos Santos Maculan, B. C. M., & de Oliveira Lima, G. A. B. (2017). Seeking a definition for the concept of concept. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação., 22(2), 54–87. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2963

Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. The Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/258704

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Journal, 14(4), 532–550. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258557

Ellis, D. (1987). The derivation of a behavioural model for information retrieval system design. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Sheffield. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9554645.pdf

Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. The Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1086/602622

Feather, J. P. (2008). The Information society: A study of continuity and change (5th ed.). Facet Publication.

Feehan, P. E., Gragg, W.L., Havener, M.M., & Kester, D.D. (1987). Library and information science research: An analysis of the 1984 journal literature. Library and Information Science Research, 9(3), 173-185. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ361398

Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2009). How and why theories matter: A comment on Felin and Foss. Organization Science, 20(3), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0432

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of information behavior. Information Today.

Fossum, P. K., Fryd, L., & Dahlhaug, O. G. (2013). Design and fatigue performance of large Utility-Scale wind turbine blades. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 135(3), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023926

Garver, N. (2008). What theory is. Journal of Folklore Research, 45(1), 63–70.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.

Glazier, J. D., & Grover, R. (2002). A multidisciplinary framework for theory building. Library Trends, 50(3), 317–329.

Gonzalez-Teruel, A., & Abad-Garcia, M. F. (2007). Information needs and uses: An analysis of the literature published in Spain, 1990–2004. Library and Information Science Research, 29(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.01.001

Gregor, S. (2002). A theory of theories in information systems. In S. Gregor & D. Hart (Eds.), Information Systems Foundations: Building the Theoretical Base (pp. 1–20). Australian National University.

Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742

Grover, R., & Glazier, J. (1986). A conceptual framework for theory building in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 8(3), 227–242.

Hall, H. (2003). Borrowed theory: Applying exchange theories in Information Science research. Library and Information Science Research, 25(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00031-8

Hannay, J., Sjoberg, D., & Dyba, T. (2007). A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2007.12

Hartel. J. (2009). Metatheoretical snowmen. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.145046013

Hauser, L. (1988). A conceptual analysis of information science. Library and Information Science Research, 10(1), 3–35.

Hider, P., & Pymm, B. (2008). Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature. Library & Information Science Research, 30(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007

Hjørland, B. (1998). Theory and meta-theory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007183

Hjørland, B. (2000). Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing & Management, 36(3), 501–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00038-2

Hjørland, B. (2013). Information Science and its core concepts: Levels of disagreement. In F. Ibekwe-Sanjuan & T. Dousa (Eds.), Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge (pp. 205–235). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6973-1_9

Hjørland, B., & Pedersen, K. N. (2005). A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 61(5), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510625804

Jacard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford.

Jarvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content analysis of research articles in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 12(4), 395–421.

Jeong, D. Y., & Kim, S. J. (2005). Knowledge structure of library and information science in South Korea. Library & Information Science Research, 27(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2004.09.004

Julien, H. (1996). A content analysis of the recent information needs and uses literature. Library & Information Science Research, 18(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90030-4

Julien, H., & Duggan, L. J. (2000). A longitudinal analysis of the information needs and uses literature. Library and Information Science Research, 22(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00057-2

Kaijun, Y., Ruiyi, G., Shanshan, H., & Song, L. (2019). Using fractal theory to study application in Library and Information Science. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 100, 779–782. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoi-19.2019.137

Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of enquiry. Chandler.

Kenworthy, T. P., & Verbeke, A. (2015). The future of strategic management research: Assessing the quality of theory borrowing. European Management Journal, 33(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.007

Kim, S. J. (2004). A study on efficiency and use of theory in library and information science. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Ewha Womans University.

Kim, S. J., & Jeong, D. Y. (2006). An analysis of the development and use of theory in Library and Information Science research articles. Library & Information Science Research, 28(4), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.018

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<361::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-%23

Kumasi, K. D., Charbonneau, D. H., & Walster, D. (2013). Theory talk in the library science scholarly literature: An exploratory analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 35(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.02.004

Lee, B., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). Discovery and representation of causal relationships in MIS: A methodological framework. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 109–134.

Lee, Y., Lee, Z., & Gosain, S. (2004). The evolving diversity of the IS discipline: Evidence from referent theoretical frameworks. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(33), 546–579. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01333

Lim, S., Saldanha, T., Malladi, S., Melville, N.P (2009). Theories used in Information Systems research: Identifying Theory Networks in Leading IS Journals. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, USA, 91. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/91

Lor, P. J. (2014). Revitalizing comparative library and information science: Theory and meta-theory. Journal of Documentation, 70(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2012-0129

Mansourian, Y. (2006). Adoption of grounded theory in LIS research. New Library World, 107 (9/10), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800610702589

Markus, L. M., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632080

McKechnie, L. E. F., & Pettigrew, K. E. (2002). Surveying the use of theory in Library and Information Science research: A disciplinary perspective. Library Trends, 50(3), 406–417.

McKechnie, L. E., Pettigrew, K. E., & Joyce, S. L. (2001). The origins and contextual use of theory in human information behavior research. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 2(November), 47–63. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/567681.567685

Mellon, C. A. (1986). Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries, 47(2), 160–165. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/14195/15641

Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.

Michell, G., & Dewdney, P. (1998). Mental models theory: Applications for Library and Information Science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/40324303

Middleton, L., Hall, H., & Raeside, R. (2019). Applications and applicability of Social Cognitive Theory in information science research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(4), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769985

Morgan, C., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Questions related to theory. In B. N. Wildemuth (Ed.). Applications of social science research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 40–47). Libraries Unlimited.

Mueller, B., & Urbach, N. (2013, December 15–18). The why, what, and how of theories in IS research [Conference presentation]. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milano, Italy. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/ResearchMethods/8

Murray, J. B., & Evers, D. J. (1989). Theory borrowing and reflectivity in interdisciplinary fields. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 647–652. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/6929/volumes/v16/NA-16

Mutula, S. M., & Majinge, R. M. (2017). Shortcomings in library and information science (LIS) PhD projects: Analyses of examined theses and supervised for the period 2008–2016 at select universities in eastern and southern Africa. Mousaion, 35(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/1886

Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Ngulube, P. (2018). Overcoming the difficulties associated with using conceptual and theoretical frameworks in heritage studies. In P. Ngulube (Ed.), Handbook of research on heritage management and preservation (pp. 1–23). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3137-1.ch001

Ngulube, P. (2020). Theory and theorising in information science scholarship. In P. Ngulube (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Connecting Research Methods for Information Science Research (pp. 18–39). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1471-9.ch002

Nour, M. M. (1985). A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980. Library and Information Science Research, 7(3), 261–273.

Ocholla, D. N., & Roux, J. L. (2011). Conceptions and misconceptions of theoretical frameworks in Library and Information Science Research: A Case Study of Selected Theses and Dissertations from Eastern and Southern African Universities. Mousaion, 29(2), 61–74.

Odi, A. (1982). Creative research and theory building in library and information sciences. College and Research Libraries, 43(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_43_04_312

Oliveira Machado, L. M., Martínez-Ávila, D., & da Graça de Melo Simões, M. (2019). Concept theory in library and information science: An epistemological analysis. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 876–891. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2018-0195

Onyancha, O. B., & Kwanya, T. (2019). Application of Information Systems theories in library and Information Science Research: A Content Analysis. In D. Njiraine (Ed.), Digital Technologies for Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 390–399). The Technical University of Kenya.

Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research–A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.

Oswick, C., Fleming, P., & Hanlon, G. (2011). From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory-building. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0155

Park, S., Lee, J., & Hollister, J. M. (2022). A systematic review on the application of the theory of information worlds. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 10(4), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2022.10.4.7

Parsa, M., Maghsoudi, A., & Ghezelbash, R. (2016). De composition of anomaly patterns of multi-element geochemical signatures in Ahar area, NW Iran: A comparison of U-spatial statistics and fractal models. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2435-5

Peritz, B. C. (1980). The methods of library science research: Some results from a bibliometric survey. Library Research, 2(3), 251–268.

Pettigrew, K. E., & McKechnie, L. E. F. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<62::AID-ASI1061>3.0.CO;2-J

Pierce, S. J. (1992). Dead Germans and the theory of librarianship. American Libraries, 23(8), 641–643. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25632667

Pinfield, S., Wakeling, S., Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2021). Open access in theory and practice: The theory-practice relationship and openness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429276842

Poole, H. L. (1985). Theories of the middle range. Ablex.

Puetz, S. J., & Borchardt, G. (2015). Quasi-periodic fractal patterns in geomagnetic reversals, geological activity, and astronomical events. Chaos Solitons & Fractals, 81(12), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.09.029

Rawson, C., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2015). Research by Design: The promise of design-based research for school library research. School Libraries Worldwide, 21(2), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.29173/slw6891

Rayward, W. B. (2004). Pioneers in library and information science. Library Trends, 52(4), 671–987.

Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A primer in theory construction. Routledge.

Rinaldo, A., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Rigon, R., Ijjasz-Vasquez, E., & Bras, R. L. (1993). Self-organized fractal river networks. Physical Review Letters, 70(6), 822–825. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.822

Rioux, K. (2010). Metatheory in Library and Information Science: A nascent social justice approach. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 9–17.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.

Sarter, M. (2006). The consequences of atheoretical, task-driven experimentation: Theoretical comment on Paban, Chambon, Jaffard, and Alescio-Lautier (2005). Behavioral Neuroscience, 120(2), 493–495. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0735-7044.120.2.49316719713

Schneberger, S. L., Hovorka, D. S., & Larsen, K. R. (2014). Introduction to theories in IS Research minitrack. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA, 4588–4588. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.563

Schrader, A. M. (1986). The domain of information science: Problems in conceptualization and in consensus-building. Information Services & Use, 6(5–6), 169–205. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-1986-65-601

Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks. Sage.

Scott, R., Albert, M., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research - why use theories in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 337, Article 949. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a949

Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S. & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 467–482. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148852

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage.

Smit, G.J. (1995). Research: Guidelines for planning and documentation. Southern Bank Publishers (Pty) Ltd.

Sonnenwald, D. H. (2016). Exploring theory development: Learning from diverse masters. In D. H. Sonnenwald (Ed.), Theory development in the information sciences (pp. 1–18). University of Texas Press.

Spink, A. (1997). Information science: A third feedback framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 728–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199708)48:8<728::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-U

Stock, J. R. (1997). Applying theories from other disciplines to logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 27(9/10), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039710188576

Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Introduction. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication (pp. 1–9). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464

Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788

Swanson R. A. (2013). Theory building in applied disciplines. Berrett-Koehlers.

Thomas, G. (1997). What’s the use of theory? Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.1.1x807532771w5u48

Thompson, M. (2009). Remembering Elfreda Chatman: A champion of theory development in library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(2), 119–126.

Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2017). Research methods in library and information science. In S. O. Dora (Ed.), Qualitative versus quantitative research (pp. 43–64). IntechOpen https://doi.org/doi:10.5772/intechopen.68749

Tsang, E. W., & Ellsaesser, F. (2011). How contrastive explanation facilitates theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 404–419. https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330963

Truex, D., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2006). Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(12), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00109

Trosow, S. E. (2000). Organizational theory in Library and Information Science Education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 41(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/40324060

Ukwoma, S. C., & Ngulube, P. (2021). To borrow or not to borrow is the question? Theory borrowing in Library Information Science postgraduate research in Nigeria and South Africa. International Information and Library Review, 53(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1790261

Vakkari, P., & Kuokkanen, M. (1997). Theory growth in information science: Applications of the theory of science to a theory of information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007210

Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308370

Van der Waldt, G. (2021). The judicious use of theory in social science research. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v17i1.1039

Van Maanen, J. (1998). Different strokes: Qualitative research in the Administrative Science Quarterly from 1956 to 1996. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative studies of organizations (pp. 9–32). Sage.

Vickery, B. (1997). Metatheory and information science. Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007206

Vogt, W. P. (1993). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Sage.

Wacker, J. G. (2004). A theory of formal conceptual definitions: Developing theory-building measurement instruments. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.002

Walster, D. (1995). Using instructional design theories in library and Information Science Education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 36(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323743

Wang, F., Shi, H., & Ji, X. (2015). The use of theory in Chinese information science research: Based on the content analysis of the journal of the China society for scientific and technical information. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 34(6), 581–591.

Wang, F., Chen, F. and Zhu, N. (2016). Theories of information science in China: Sources, uses and discipline exclusive degrees. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 35(11), 1148–1164.

Wang, F., Zhao, H., & Zhang, W. (2018). Full-scale data analysis on the patterns and academic influence of information science theoretical research in China. Document, Information and Knowledge, 6, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.13366/j.dik.2018.06.015

Wang, F., Yang, J., & Wu, Y. (2021). Non-synchronism in theoretical research of information science. Journal of Documentation, 77(6), 1430–1454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2020-0215

Watson, R. (2001). Research in information systems: What we haven’t learned. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 5–15.

Weber, R. (2003). Editors comments: Theoretically speaking. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036536

Weick, K. E. (1985). Theoretical assumptions and research methodology selection. In F. W. McFarlan (Ed.), The information systems research challenge (pp. 111–132). Harvard Business School Press.

Weick, K. (1989). Organized improvisation: Twenty years of organizing. Communications Studies, 40(3), 241–248.

Welman, J. C., & Kruger, S.J. (1999). Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences. Oxford University Press.

Westin, S. M., Roy, M., & Kim, C. K. (1994). Cross-Fertilizations of knowledge: The case of mIS and its reference disciplines. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(2), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.1994040103

Whetten, D. A., Felin, T., & King, B. G. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 20(10), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063083305

Wu, M. M., Liang, H.S., Hsieh, H.H., & Lee, V. (2017). Theory use in library and information science journals in Taiwan 2010–2015. In W. Sterzer (Ed.), Proceedings of the iConference (pp. 717–721). https://hdl.handle.net/2142/96706