References

Aaltojärvi, I., Arminen, I., Auranen, O., & Pasanen, H.-M. (2008). Scientific productivity, web visibility and citation patterns in sixteen Nordic sociology departments. Acta Sociologica, 51(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699307086815

Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2017). E-visibility to enhance knowledge sharing. 1–12. [ResearchGate] https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17191.24489

Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.012

Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312

Besancenot, D., Huynh, K. V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73(4), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7

Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. European Science Editing, 37(3), 77–80. https://eseaug11viewpointsbornmann.pdf (ease.org.uk)

Buzdygan, D., & Górski, M. M. (2015). Jak biblioteka może wspierać zarządzanie reputacją naukową uczonych i zespołów badawczych [How the library can support the management of the scientific reputation of scholars and research teams]. In T. Piestrzyński & J. Jerzyk-Wojtecka (Eds.), Biblioteka w społeczeństwie wiedzy. Informacja, Edukacja, Profesjonalizm (pp. 101–118). Wydawnictwo UŁ. https://doi. org/10.18778/8088-191-4.08

Chung, C. J., & Park, H. W. (2012). Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals. Scientometrics, 93(1), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-012-0707-8

Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 2(4), 195–201.

Danesh, F., Fattahi, R., & Dayani, M. H. (2017). Stratification of Iranian LIS academics in terms of visibility, effectiveness and scientific and professional performance: Research report Part 1. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616632866

De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to Cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.

Drabek, A. (2018). Indeksowanie czasopism w referencyjnych bazach danych [Indexing journals in reference databases]. figshare. https://figshare.com/articles/ Indeksowanie_czasopism_w_referencyjnych_bazach_danych/5683972

Espin, J., Palmas, S., Carrasco-Rueda, F., Riemer, K., Allen, P. E., Berkebile, N., … Bruna, E. M. (2017). A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology. PLOS Biology, 15(12), e2002760. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002760

Fogarty, T. J., & Liao, C.-H. (2009). Blessed are the gatekeepers: A longitudinal study of the editorial boards of the accounting review. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.299

García-Carpintero, E., Granadino, B., & Plaza, L. M. (2010). The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scientific output of the same countries. Scientometrics, 84(3), 799–811. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-010-0199-3

Gasparyan, A. Y. (2013). Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(7), 972–973. https://doi.org/10.3346/ jkms.2013.28.7.972

Hardin, W. G., Beauchamp, C. F., Liano, K., & Hill, M. (2006). Research and real estate editorial board membership. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2006.12091616

Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 .

Harzing, A.-W., & Metz, I. (2013). Practicing what we preach: The geographic diversity of editorial boards. Management International Review, 53(2), 169–187. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11575-011-0124-x

Haugsbakk, G., & Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2020). On the expression of hegemony in the field of educational technology: - a case study of editorials in a Norwegian academic journal. Seminar.Net, 16(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4044

Haustein, S. (2015). Scientific interactions and research evaluation: From bibliometrics to altmetrics. In F. Pehar, C. Schlögl, & C. Wolff (Eds.), Re: inventing information science in the networked society. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science (ISI 2015) (pp. 36–42). Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.

Jokić, M., & Sirotić, G. (2015). Do the international editorial board members of Croatian social sciences and humanities journals contribute to their visibility. Media Research: Croatian Journal for Journalism and the Media, 21(2), 5–32. https://bib.irb.hr/ datoteka/798281.01_jokic.pdf

Kokowski, M. (2015). Szkic aktualnej debaty nad naukometrią i bibliometrią w Polsce i zapomniane naukoznawstwo [A sketch on the current debate on scientometrics and bibliometrics versus the forgotten science of science]. Prace Komisji Histroii Nauki PAU, 14, 117–134.

Kulczycki, E., & Korytkowski, P. (2020). Standardy wydawnicze polskich czasopism naukowych w latach 2017–2019 [Publishing standards of Polish scientific journals in 2017-2019]. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.11734350

Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., & Drabek, A. (2019a). Internationalization of Polish journals in the social sciences and humanities: Transformative role of the research evaluation system. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs28794

Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., Engels, T. C. E., Guns, R., Hołowiecki, M., & Pölönen,

J. (2019b). How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing. PLoS One, 14(3), e0214423. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0214423

Kwiek, M. (2015). Academic generations and academic work: Patterns of attitudes, behaviors, and research productivity of Polish academics after 1989. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1354–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1060706

Kwiek, M. (2018). Academic top earners. research productivity, prestige generation, and salary patterns in European universities. Science and Public Policy, 45(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx020

Lee, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Exploring the web visibility of world-class universities. Scientometrics, 90(1), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0515-6

Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5–25. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2279062

Lindsey, D. (1978). The scientific publication system in social science (1st ed). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Lindsey, D. (1989). Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science measuring what’s measurable rather than what’s valid. Scientometrics, 15(3–4), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017198

Lowe, D. J., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting journal editorial board membership. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.07.004

Maisonobe, M., Grossetti, M., Milard, B., Jégou, L., & Eckert, D. (2017). The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process (1999–2011). Scientometrics, 113(1), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2463-2

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

Medoff, M. H. (2003). Editorial favoritism in economics? Southern Economic Journal, 70(2), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.2307/3648979

Mendonça, S., Pereira, J., & Ferreira, M. E. (2018). Gatekeeping African studies: what does “editormetrics” indicate about journal governance? Scientometrics, 117(3), 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2909-1

Merton, R. K. (1974). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Univ. of Chicago Pr.

Metz, I., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.8.4.zqr540

Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21532

Minister Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. (2019). Komunikat Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 18 grudnia 2019 r. W sprawie wykazu czasopism naukowych i recenzowanych materiałów z konferencji międzynarodowych [Announcement of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 18 December 2019. In the Matter of the List of Scientific Journals and Peer-Reviewed Materials from International Conferences]. In Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej, MNiSW.

Norman, E. R. (2012). Maximizing journal article citation online: readers, robots, and research visibility. Politics & Policy, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00342.x

Olechnicka, A., & Płoszaj, A. (2009). Polskie publikacje z zakresu nauk społecznych i humanistycznych w bazie Web of Science [Polish publications in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in the Web of Science database]. Edukacja Ustawiczna Dorosłych, 1(64), 35–45. https://edukacjaustawicznadoroslych.eu/pliki/2009/edu_1_2009.pdf

Pacher, A. (2021). A list of academic publishers and their scholarly journals: A webscraping approach [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/56b28

Pacher, A., Heck, T., & Schoch, K. (2021). Open editors: a dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jvzq7

Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010). The ‘dialectics of change’ as a facet of globalisation: Epistemic modality in academic writing. In M. F. Ruiz-Garrido, J. C. Palmer-Silveira, & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), English for Professional and academic purposes (pp. 25–41). Brill | Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029569

Rębisz, S. (2017). The presence of Polish, Hungarian and Slovak publications in the field of education in the web of science database. A bibliometric comparative study. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 12(1), 21–35. http://epa.oszk. hu/01400/01428/00039/pdf/EPA01428_ptse_2017_01_021-035.pdf

Rębisz, S. (2019). Geograficzny rozkład afiliacji członków rad redakcyjnych dziesięciu najwyżej rangowanych czasopism z Europy Wschodniej, z obszaru Education, wg wskaźnika SCImago Journal Rank, w roku 2018 [Geographical representation of the editorial board members of the top ten journals from Eastern Europe, from the education area, according to the SCImago Journal Rank index in 2018 process]. Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka, 30(4), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.15584/eti.2019.4.30

Rębisz, S., & Kapczyński, M. (2018). Aktywność publikacyjna pracowników sektora nauki i badań z Polski, Słowacji i Węgier w latach 2005–2009 i 2010–2014 [The publishing activity of Polish, Slovakian and Hungarian academics and researchers in 2005–2009 and 2010–2014]. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 44(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.4 467/20843968ZP.18.032.9935

Rozkosz, E. A. (2017). Polskie czasopisma pedagogiczne w „Wykazach czasopism punktowanych” w latach 2012, 2013 i 2015 [Polish pedagogical journals in ‘Lists of scoring journals’ in 2012, 2013 and 2015]. In E. Kulczycki (Ed.), Komunikacja naukowa w humanistyce: Vol. V (pp. 153–173). Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM.

Rychlik, M. (2017). Perspektywy stosowania wskaźników altmetrycznych w ocenie dorobku polskiej humanistyki [Perspectives for the use of altimetric indicators in the evaluation of the Polish humanities output]. In E. Kulczycki (Ed.), Komunikacja naukowa w humanistyce: Vol. V (pp. 91–102). Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM.

Ward, J., Bejarano, W., & Dudás, A. (2015). Scholarly social media profiles and libraries: A review. LIBER Quarterly, 24(4), 174–204. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9958

Weinrach, S. G., Thomas, K. R., Pruett, S. R., & Chan, F. (2006). Scholarly productivity of editorial board members of three American counseling and counseling psychology journals. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-005-9009-7

Xiao-jun, H., & Zhen-ying, C. (2013). Excellent editors need to be good authors too. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1087/20130108

Xie, Y., Wu, Q., & Li, X. (2019). Editorial team scholarly index (ETSI): an alternative indicator for evaluating academic journal reputation. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03177-x

Zdeněk, R., & Lososová, J. (2018). An analysis of editorial board members’ publication output in agricultural economics and policy journals. Scientometrics, 117(1), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2881-9