References

Adema, J., & Ferwerda, E. (2014). Publication practices in motion: The benefits of open access publishing for the humanities. In P. Dávidházi (Ed.), New publication cultures in the humanities: Exploring the paradigm shift (pp 131–46). Amsterdam University Press. https://pureportal.coventry.ac.uk/en/publications/ publication-practices-in-motion-the-benefits-of-open-access-publi .

Australian Research Council. (2018). Australian Research Council Profile. Australian Research Council. https://www.arc.gov.au/about-arc/arc-profile .

Australian Research Council. (2020). How to become an ARC assessor. Australian Research Council. https://www.arc.gov.au/how-become-arc-assessor .

Blankstein, M., & Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2019, April 12). Ithaka S + R US faculty survey 2018. Ithaka S + R. https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SR-Report US-Faculty-Survey-2018-04122019.pdf .

Bonaccorso, E., Bozhankova, R., Cadena, C., Čapská, V., Czerniewicz, L., Emmett, A., Oludayo, F., Glukhova, N., Greenberg, M., Hladnik, M., Grillet, M., Indrawan, M., Kapović, M., Kleiner, Y., Łaziński, M., Loyola, R., Menon, S., Morales, L., Ocampo, C., … Rosenblum, B. (2014). Bottlenecks in the open-access system: Voices from around the globe. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), Article eP1126. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1126 .

Bosman, J., Frantsvåg, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., & Proudman, V. (2021). OA diamond journals study. Part 1: findings. Zenodo.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis. The University of Auckland. https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/ about/our-research/documents/Answers%20to%20frequently%20asked%20 questions%20about%20thematic%20analysis%20April%202019.pdf .

Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. In Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 222–248). SAGE Publications.

Collins, E., & Milloy, C. (2016). OAPEN-UK final report: A five-year study into open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences. Jisc. https://oapen. fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com/7a65d73f1087444d80807833a320fa36.pdf .

Coonin, B., & Younce, L. M. (2010). Publishing in open access education journals: The authors’ perspectives. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639261003742181 .

Cooper, D., Mahoney, C., Springer, R., Behra, R., Beilin, I., Burak, G., Burri, M., Carns,

P. M., Champagne, A., Cobine, C., Cole, H., Courtney, A., Donlon, A., Ecklund, A., Evelyn, S., Fanning, D., Figueroa, P., Friedland, N., González, L., … Witte, S. (2020, September 9). Supporting research in languages and literature. Ithaka S + R. https://doi. org/10.18665/sr.313810 .

Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., & White,

S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(sup1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361453 3.2010.518851 .

Edelmann, N., & Schoßböck, J. (2020). Open access perceptions, strategies, and digital literacies: A case study of a scholarly-led journal. Publications, 8(3):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8030044 .

Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012 .

Eve, M. P., Vega, P. C., & Edwards, C. (2020). Lessons from the Open Library of Humanities. LIBER Quarterly, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10327 .

Gross, J., & Ryan, J. C. (2015). Landscapes of research: Perceptions of open access (OA) publishing in the arts and humanities. Publications, 3(2), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020065 .

Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Ardern, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Ciro, J. B., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Egger, M., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., … Lalu,

M. M. (2019). Predatory journals: No definition, no defence. Nature, 576(7786), 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y .

Kim, J. (2010). Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1909–1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21336 .

Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. acalib.2011.02.017 .

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. http://archive.org/details/naturalisticinqu00linc .

Massarani, L., Rodrigues, M., Longmene Kaze, B., Badr, H., & Mazouzi, R. (2021, May 10). Open access ‘excludes’ developing world scientists. Sci Dev Net. https://www.scidev. net/global/features/open-access-excludes-developing-world-scientists/ .

Mrva-Montoya, A., Luca, E. J., & Boateng, H. (2019). Understanding Australian academic authors in the humanities and social sciences: Their publishing experiences, values, and perspectives. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51(1), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.1.03 .

Narayan, B., & Luca, E. J. (2017). Issues and challenges in researchers’ adoption of open access and institutional repositories: A contextual study of a university repository. Information Research, 22(4), paper rails 1608. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/ handle/10453/121438 .

Narayan, B., Luca, E. J., Tiffen, B., England, A., Booth, M., & Boateng, H. (2018). Scholarly communication practices in humanities and social sciences: A study of researchers’ attitudes and awareness of open access. Open Information Science, 2(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0013 .

Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Xu, J., Świgoń, M., & Herman, E. (2020). Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1284 .

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 .

Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238–264. https://doi. org/10.1108/11766091111162070 .

Quigley, N. (2021a). HRE 2020-0598 research data: Interview transcripts (Version 3) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4774447 .

Quigley, N. (2021b). HRE 2020-0598 research data: Interview guide (Version 1) [Interview guide]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4774475 .

Richardson, J. W., McLeod, S., & Hurst, T. (2019). Perceptions of educational leadership faculty regarding open access publishing. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2019v15n5a817 .

Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013 .

Serrano-Vicente, R., Melero, R., & Abadal, E. (2016). Open access awareness and perceptions in an institutional landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002 .

Severin, A., Egger, M., Eve, M. P., & Hürlimann, D. (2020). Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 7:1925. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2 .

Singh Chawla, D. (2021, October 25). The blurred line of responsibility between research offices and libraries. Nature Index. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/ blurred-line-responsibility-between-research-offices-libraries .

Suber, P. (2012).Economics. In P. Suber (Ed.), Open Access (1st ed.). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.003.0009

Suber, P. (2017, June 8). Why is open access moving so slowly in the humanities? Blog of the APA. https://blog.apaonline.org/2017/06/08/ open-access-in-the-humanities-part-2/ .

Suber, P. (2019). Varieties. In P. Suber (Ed.), Open Access (1st ed.). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.003.0005 .

Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Christian, L., Jones, M. K., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish,

A. (2017). Imagining a gold open access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824 .

United Nations. (n.d.). Global citizenship. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/ academic-impact/global-citizenship .

Williamson, K. (2017). Research concepts. In K. Williamson & G. Johanson (Eds.), Research methods: Information, systems, and contexts (2nd ed., pp. 3–25). Chandos Publishing.

Xia, J. (2010). A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward openaccess journal publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21283 .

Xia, J. (2011). An anthropological emic-etic perspective on open access practices. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111105461 .

Yang, Z., & Li, Y. (2015). University faculty awareness and attitudes towards open access publishing and the institutional repository: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), eP1210. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1210 .

Zhu, Y. (2017). Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice. Scientometrics, 111(2), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z .