Anderson, R. (2015, May 11). Should we retire the term ‘predatory publishing’?. The

Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/05/11/should we-retire-the-term-predatory-publishing/ .

Anderson, R. (2017, July 25). Cabell’s new predatory journal blacklist: A review. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet. org/2017/07/25/cabells-new-predatory-journal-blacklist-review/ .

Anderson, R. (2019, May 1). Cabell’s predatory journal blacklist: An updated review. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet. org/2019/05/01/cabells-predatory-journal-blacklist-an-updated-review/ .

Anderson, R. (2020, March 3). Why should we worry about predatory journals? Here’s one reason. The Source. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://blog.cabells.com/2020/03/03/ guest-post-why-should-we-worry-about-predatory-journals-heres-one-reason/ .

Beall, J. (2010). “Predatory” Open-Access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10–17.

Beall, J. (2013). The Open-Access movement is not really about open access. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11(2), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525 .

Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029 .

Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s list: Better understanding predatory publishers. College & Research Libraries News, 76(3), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.5860/ crln.76.3.9277 .

Bisaccio, M. (2018). Cabells’ journal whitelist and blacklist: Intelligent data for informed journal evaluations. Learned Publishing, 31(3), 243–248. https://doi. org/10.1002/leap.1164 .

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60 .

Callicott, B. (2015). A Website review — Cabell’s international: A welcome tool in a world of predatory journals. Against the Grain, 27(5), 50–52. https://doi. org/10.7771/2380-176X.7193 .

Chen, X. (2019). Beall’s list and Cabell’s blacklist: A comparison of two lists of predatory OA journals. Serials Review, 45(4), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/009879 13.2019.1694810 .

COPE. (2019). Discussion document: Predatory publishing. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.6 .

Crawford, W. (2014). Journals, “journals” and wannabes: Investigating the list. Cites & Insights, 14 (7), 1–24. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from http://citesandinsights.info/ civ14i7.pdf .

Crawford, W. (2016). Gray OA 2012-2016: Gold OA beyond DOAJ. [Dataset]. https:// doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4275860.v1 .

Crawford, W. (2017). Gray OA 2012-2016: Open Access journals beyond DOAJ. Cites & Insights, 17(1), 1–68. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://citesandinsights.info/ civ17i1.pdf .

Cukier, S., Helal, L., Rice, D. B., Pupkaite, J., Ahmadzai, N., Wilson, M., … Moher,

D. (2020). Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: A systematic review. BMC Medicine 18:104, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1 .

DOAJ. (2017, December 13). The reapplications project is officially complete. News Service. https://blog.doaj.org/2017/12/13/the-reapplications-project-is-officially complete/ .

EBSCO. (2019). EBSCO & Open Access. https://www.ebsco.com/open-access .

Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2017). The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 20(2), 163–170. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3 .

Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2018). Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’. Learned Publishing, 31(2), 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1135 .

Eve, M. P., & Priego, E. (2017). Who is actually harmed by predatory publishers?

TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.867 .

ExLibris. (2019a). Ulrich’s collection policies. ExLibris Knowledge Center. Retrieved August 26, 2020, from https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Ulrich’s/ Product_Documentation/Overview/Ulrich%E2%80%99s_Collection_Policies .

ExLibris. (2019b). Predatory publications. ExLibris Knowledge Center. Retrieved August 26, 2020, from https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Knowledge_Articles/ Predatory_Publications .

Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., … Lalu, M. M. (2019). Predatory journals: No definition, no defence. Nature, 576(7786), 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y .

Houghton, F., & Houghton, S. (2018). “Blacklists” and “whitelists”: A salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 527–530. https://doi. org/10.5195/jmla.2018.490 .

Laine, C., & Winker, M. A. (2017). Identifying predatory or pseudo-Journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.031 .

Linacre, S. (2019, October 2). The journal blacklist surpasses the 12,000 journals listed mark. The Source. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://blog.cabells.com/2019/10/02/ the-journal-blacklist-surpasses-the-12000-journals-listed-mark/ .

Linacre, S. (2020, February 26). Growth of predatory publishing shows no sign of slowing. The Source. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://blog.cabells.com/2020/02/26/ growth-of-predatory-publishing-shows-no-sign-of-slowing/ .

Linacre, S., Bisaccio, M., & Earle, L. (2019). Publishing in an environment of predation: The many things you really wanted to know, but did not know how to ask. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10517 12X.2019.1603423 .

Manca, A., Cugusi, L., Dvir, Z., & Deriu, F. (2017). PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion. The Lancet, 390(10096), 734–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(17)31943-8 .

Matumba, L., Maulidi, F., Balehegn, M., Abay, F., Salanje, G., Lewis Dzimbiri, & Kaunda, E. (2019). Blacklisting or whitelisting? Deterring faculty in developing countries from publishing in substandard journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 50(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.2.01 .

Nelson, N., & Huffman, J. (2015). Predatory journals in library databases: How much should we worry? The Serials Librarian, 69(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615 26X.2015.1080782 .

Olivarez, J. D., Bales, S., Sare, L., & vanDuinkerken, W. (2018). Format aside: Applying Beall’s criteria to assess the predatory nature of both OA and non-OA library and information science journals. College & Research Libraries, 79(1), 52–67. https://doi. org/10.5860/crl.79.1.52 .

Rentier, B. (2018). Science Ouverte, le défi de la transparence. Bruxelles: Académie Royale de Belgique.

Schmitz, J. (2019). Qualitätssicherung bei Open-Access-Zeitschriften und predatory publishing. GMS Medizin – Bibliothek – Information, 19(1–2):Doc09, 1–6. https://doi. org/10.3205/mbi000434 .

Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Egger, M., Domingo, M., & Barros, T. (2020). Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics. BioRxiv: The Preprint Server for Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.09.983155 .

Shaghaei, N., Wien, C., Holck, J., Thiesen, A. L., Ellegaard, O., Vlachos, E., & Drachen, T. (2018). Being a deliberate prey of a predator: Researchers’ thoughts after having published in predatory journal. LIBER Quarterly, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi. org/10.18352/lq.10259 .

Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015). ‘Predatory’ Open Access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13(1), Article 230, n.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2 .

Siler, K. (2020). Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology [Early view]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.24339 .

Somoza-Fernández, M., Rodríguez-Gairín, J.-M., & Urbano, C. (2016). Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list. El Profesional de La Información, 25 (5), 730–737. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from http://hdl. handle.net/10760/30115 .

Strinzel, M., Severin, A., Milzow, K., & Egger, M. (2019). Blacklists and whitelists to tackle predatory publishing: A cross-sectional comparison and thematic analysis. MBio, 10(3), e00411-19, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00411-19 .

Swauger, S. (2017). Open Access, power, and privilege: A response to “What I learned from predatory publishing.” College & Research Libraries News, 78(11), 603–606. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.78.11.603 .

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Tsigaris, P. (2018). What value do journal whitelists and blacklists have in academia? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.017 .

Toutloff, L. (2019a, March 8). Cabell’s blacklist criteria v 1.0. The Source. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://blog.cabells.com/2019/03/08/v1-0/ .

Toutloff, L. (2019b, March 20). Cabell’s blacklist criteria v 1.1. The Source. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://blog.cabells.com/2019/03/20/blacklist-criteria-v1-1/ .

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Open-Access website gets tough. Nature News, 512(7512), 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/512017a .