Bravo, G., Grimaldo, F., López-Iñesta, E., Mehmani, B., & Squazzoni, F. (2019). The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals. Nature Communications, 10:322, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2 .

Godlee, F. (2002). Making reviewers visible. Openness, accountability, and credit. JAMA, 287(21), 2762–2765. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2762 .

Groves, T. (2010). Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes. BMJ, 341:c6424, n.p. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6424 .

Kaatz, A., Gutierrez, B., & Carnes, M. (2014). Threats to objectivity in peer review: The case of gender. Trends in Pharmacolpgical Sciences, 35(8), 371–373. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tips.2014.06.005 .

Khan, K. (2010). Is open peer review the fairest system? No. BMJ, 341:c6425, n.p. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6425 .

Le Sueur, H., Dagliati, A., Buchan, I., Whetton, A. D., Martin, G. P., Dornan, T., & Geifman, N. (2020). Pride and prejudice – What can we learn from peer review? Medical Teacher, Ahead of print, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1774527 .

Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2–17. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.22784 .

Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(2), 161–175.

Rodgers, P. (2017). Peer review: Decisions, decisions. eLife, 6, e32011, n.p. https://doi. org/10.7554/elife.32011 .

Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000 Research, 6:588, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.12688/ f1000research.11369.2 .

Smith, R. (1999). Opening up BMJ peer review. BMJ, 318(7175), 4–5. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4 .

Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process and the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1258/ jrsm.99.4.178 .

Squazzoni, F., Ahrweiler, P., Barros, T., Bianchi, F., Birukou, A., Blom, H. J. J., … Willis,

M. (2020). Unlock ways to share data on peer review. Nature, 578, 512–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00500-y .

Thelwall, M., Allen, L., Papas, E.-R., Nyakoojo, Z., & Weigert, V. (2020). Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model. Journal of Information Science, 016555152093867, 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1177/0165551520938678 .

Van Rooyen, S., Delamothe, T., & Evans, S. J. W. (2010). Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 341, c5729. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.c5729 .

Van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Black, N., & Smith, R. (1999). Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: A randomised trial. BMJ, 318, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23 .

Walsh, E., Rooney, M., Appleby, L., & Wilkinson, G. (2000). Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.1.47 .

Zong, Q., Xie, Y., & Liang, J. (2020). Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ. Scientometrics, n.p. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03545-y .