References

Adema, J. (2018, April 5). Scholar-led publishing: Scaling small. OpenAIRE workshop, Royal Library, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://www.slideshare.net/ OpenAIRE_eu/openaire-workshop-beyond-apcs-janneke-adema .

Archambault, É., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of Open Access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world levels—1996–2013. Science-Metrix. Retrieved April 28, 2019, from http://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/ publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf .

arXiv. (2013). FAQ. http://arxiv.org/help/support/faq [accessed December 22, 2013].

Bodó, B. (2018a). Library genesis in numbers: Mapping the underground flow of knowledge. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Shadow libraries: Access to educational materials in global higher education (pp. 53–78). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bodó, B. (2018b). The genesis of library genesis: The birth of a global scholarly shadow library. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Shadow libraries: Access to educational materials in global higher education (pp. 25–52). The MIT Press.

Bohannon, J. (2016, April 28). Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science. https:// www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone .

Bond, D. (2017, August 8). RELX buys Bepress to boost academic publishing. Financial Times. https://amp.ft.com/content/c6f6c594-7787-11e7-a3e8-60495fe6ca71 .

Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Zone Books.

cOAlition S. (2019). COAlition S response to Springer Nature’s Open Letter on Transformative Journals. Plan S and COAlition S. https://www.coalition-s.org/ coalition-s-response-to-springer-natures-open-letter-on-transformative-journals/ .

cOAlition S. (2020). Plan S. Plan S and COAlition S. https://www.coalition-s.org/ .

Crow, R., Gallagher, R., & Naim, K. (2019). Subscribe to Open: A practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access. Learned Publishing (Early view). https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1262 .

Davies, W. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Debat, H., & Babini, D. (2019). Plan S: Take Latin America’s long experience on board. Nature, 573, 495–495. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02857-1 .

Docherty, T. (2011). For the University: Democracy and the future of the institution. London: Bloomsbury.

Elsevier. (2017, August 2). Elsevier acquires bepress, a leading service provider used by academic institutions to showcase their research. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/ about/press-releases/corporate/elsevier-acquires-bepress,-a-leading-service provider-used-by-academic-institutions-to-showcase-their-research .

Eve, M. P. (2014a). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781316161012 .

Eve, M. P. (2014b). All that glisters: Investigating collective funding mechanisms for gold open access in humanities disciplines. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(3):eP1131, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1131 .

Eve, M. P. (2018, January 21). How learned societies could flip to Open Access, with no author-facing charges, using a consortial model. Martin Paul Eve. https://www.martineve. com/2018/01/21/how-learned-societies-could-flip-to-oa-using-a-consortial-model/ .

Eve, M. P., & Byers, A. (2018). Janeway: A scholarly communications platform. Insights, 31:15, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.396 .

Eve, M. P., & Gray, J. (Eds.). (2020). Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Eve, M. P., Inglis, K., Prosser, D., Speicher, L., & Stone, G. (2017). Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 30(3), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1629/ uksg.392 .

Fitzpatrick, K. (2020). Not all networks: Toward open, sustainable research communities. In M. P. Eve & J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hartley, J., Potts, J., Montgomery, L., Rennie, E., & Neylon, C. (2019). Do we need to move from communication technology to user community? A new economic model of the journal as a club. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ leap.1228 .

Holmwood, J. (Ed.) (2011). A manifesto for the public university. London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666459 .

Holmwood, J. (2013, July). The neo-liberal knowledge regime, inequality and social critique. OpenDemocracy. http://www.opendemocracy.net/john-holmwood/ neo-liberal-knowledge-regime-inequality-and-social-critique .

Knowledge Unlatched. (2013). How it works. http://www.knowledgeunlatched.org/ about/how-it-works/ [accessed December 5, 2013].

Lawson, S. (2019). Open Access policy in the UK: From neoliberalism to the commons [Doctoral Thesis, Birkbeck, University of London]. https://hcommons.org/deposits/ item/hc:23661/ .

Lawson, S. (2020). The political histories of UK public libraries and access to knowledge. In M. P. Eve & J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Lewis, D. W., Goetsch, L., Graves, D., & Roy, M. (2018). Funding community controlled open infrastructure for scholarly communication: The 2.5% commitment initiative. College & Research Libraries News, 79(3), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.5860/ crln.79.3.133 .

McKenzie, L. (2017, August 3). Elsevier expands footprint in scholarly workflow. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved April 28, 2019, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/03/ elsevier-makes-move-institutional-repositories-acquisition-bepress .

Packer, A. L. (1998a). SciELO – Scientific Electronic Library Online. Proceedings of ICSU Press Workshop on Economics, real costs and benefits of electronic publishing in science—a technical study, Keble College, University of Oxford. Retrieved April 28, 2019, from http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/icsu/packerppr.htm .

Packer, A. L. (1998b). The SciELO Project initiative for Latin America and Caribbean. AAAS/UNESCO/ICSU Workshop on Developing practices and standards for electronic publishing in Science, UNESCO HQ, Paris.

Packer, A. L. (2020). The pasts, presents, and futures of SciELO. In M. P. Eve &

J. Gray (Eds.), Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Page, B. (2020, January 10). Taylor & Francis buys F1000 Research. The Bookseller. https://www.thebookseller.com/news/ taylor-francis-buys-f1000-research-ltd-1150791 .

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., … Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375, n.p. https://doi.org/10.7717/ peerj.4375 .

Potts, J., Hartley, J., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., & Rennie, E. (2017). A journal is a club: A new economic model for scholarly publishing. Prometheus, 35(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2017.1386949 .

Putano, B. (2019, August 30). The 5 most popular programming languages of 2019. Stackify. https://stackify.com/popular-programming-languages-2018/ .

Schonfeld, R. C. (2017, August 7). Reflections on Elsevier Acquires bepress.” Ithaka S+R. https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/reflections-on-elsevier-acquires-bepress/ .

SCOAP3. (2014). Frequently asked questions and answers. SPARC. http://www.sparc. arl.org/resources/papers-guides/scoap3-faq [accessed May 20, 2014].

Siler, K., Haustein, S., Smith, E., Larivière, V., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: The case of global health research. PeerJ, 6, e4269, n.p. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4269 .

Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. http://bit.ly/oa-book .

Supporters. (2020). The Open Library of Humanities. https://openlibhums.org/ plugins/supporters/ .

The Global Sustainability Coalition for Open Science Services (SCOSS). (2020). SCOSS. https://scoss.org/ .

Toshkov, D. (2018, November 6). The ‘Global South’ is a terrible term. Don’t use it! RE-DESIGN. http://re-design.dimiter.eu/?p=969 .

Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.