ALVIN. (2019). Technical Presentation. Uppsala University Library. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://info.alvin-portal.org/about-alvin/ technical-presentation/ .

Aparac-Jelušić, T. (2017). Digital libraries for cultural heritage: Development, outcomes, and challenges from European perspectives. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool. https:// doi.org/10.2200/S00775ED1V01Y201704ICR058 .

Björk, L. (2015). How reproductive is a reproduction? Digital transmission of text based documents. Doctoral Thesis. Borås: University of Borås. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:860844/INSIDE01.pdf .

Boot, P., & Van Zundert, J. (2011). The Digital Edition 2.0 and the Digital Library: Services, Not Resources. Bibliothek und Wissenschaft, 44, 141–152. Retrieved July 16, 2019 from http://peterboot.nl/pub/vanzundert-boot-services-not-resources-2011.pdf .

Caro, S. (2016). Digitizing your collection: Public library success stories. Chicago: American Library Association.

Coutts, M. (2016). Stepping away from the silos: Strategic collaboration in digitisation. Amsterdam: Chandos.

Dahlström, M. (2010). Critical editing and critical digitisation. In W. van Peursen, E. D. Thoutenhoofd, & A. van der Weel (Eds.), Text comparison and digital creativity: The production of presence and meaning in digital text scholarship (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam: Brill.

Dahlström, M. (2011). Editing libraries. Bibliothek und Wissenschaft, 44, 91–106. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/ diva2:871326/FULLTEXT01.pdf .

Dahlström, M., & Ore, E.S. (2013). Elektronisches Edieren in Skandinavien. In P. Henrikson & C. Janss (Eds.), Geschichte der Editionen in Skandinavien (pp. 143–166). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Dahlström, M., & Dillen, W. (2017). Review of “Litteraturbanken: The Swedish Literature Bank.” RIDE, 6, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18716/ride.a.6.2 .

Dahlström, M., Hansson, J., & Kjellman, U. (2012). ‘As we may digitize’ – Institutions and documents reconfigured. LIBER Quarterly, 21(4), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8036 .

Erway, R. (2012). Increasing access to special collections. LIBER Quarterly, 21(2), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8026 .

Gabler, H.W. (2018). Cultural versus editorial canonising: The cases of Shakespeare, of Joyce. In H.W. Gabler (Ed.), Text genetics in literary modernism and other essays (pp. 363–382). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0120.16 .

Gaskell, P. (1972). A new introduction to bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giacometti, A., Campagnolo, A., MacDonald, L., Mahony, S., Robson, S., …. Gibson, A. (2015). The value of critical destruction: Evaluating multispectral image processing methods for the analysis of primary historical texts. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv036 .

Gooding, P. (2013). Mass digitization and the garbage dump: The conflicting needs of quantitative and qualitative methods. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(3), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs054 .

Gooding, P., Terras, M., & Warwick, C. (2013). The myth of the new: 28(4), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt051 .

Greetham, D.C. (1992). Textual scholarship. In J. Gibaldi (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures (pp. 101–137). New York: Modern Language Association.

Greetham, D.C. (2013). A history of textual scholarship. In N. Freistat & J. Flanders (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to textual scholarship (pp. 16–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139044073 .

Henny, U., & Neuber, F. (2017). Criteria for reviewing digital text collections, version 1.0. Köln: Institut für Dokumentologie und Editorik. Retrieved July 16, 2019 from http:// web.archive.org/web/201770727080330/https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/ weitereschriften/criteria-text-collections-version-1-0/ .

Hjørland, B. (2007). Arguments for ‘the bibliographic paradigm.’ Some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC. Information Research, 12(4), 1–16. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http://www.informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis06. html .

Hockey, S. (2000). Electronic texts in the humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ivanova, K., Dobreva, M., Stanchev, P., & Totkov, G. (Eds.). (2012). Access to digital cultural heritage: Innovative applications of automated metadata generation. Plovdiv: Plovdiv University Publishing House “Paisii Hilendarski.” Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http://www.math.bas.bg/infres/book-ADCH/ADCH-front.pdf .

Lavagnino, J. (2009). Access. Literary and linguistic computing, 24(1), 63–76. https:// doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn038 .

Litteraturbanken. (2019). Litteraturbanken innehåller just nu. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://litteraturbanken.se/om/statistik .

Martinez, M., & Terras, M. (2019). ‘Not adopted’: The UK orphan works licensing scheme and how the crisis of copyright in the cultural heritage sector restricts access to digital content. Open Library of Humanities, 5(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.16995/ olh.335 .

McCarty, W. (2012). Collaborative research in the digital humanities. In M. Deegan &

W. McCarty (Eds.), Collaborative research in the humanities (1st ed., pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.

Milne, R. (2008). From “Boutique” to mass digitization: The Google library project at Oxford. In R. Earnshaw & J. Vince (Eds.), Digital convergence: Libraries of the future (1st. ed., pp. 3–9). London: Springer.

Morgan, P. (2016). Not your DH teddy bear; or, emotional labor is not going away. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://acrl.ala.org/dh/2016/07/29/ not-your-dh-teddy-bear/ .

Muñoz, T. (2012). Digital humanities in the library isn’t a service. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http://trevormunoz.com/notebook/2012/08/19/doing-dh-in-the-library.html .

National Library of Norway. (2018). Bokhylla. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https:// www.nb.no/search?mediatype=b%C3%B8ker .

Nowviskie, B. (2011). A skunk in the library. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http:// nowviskie.org/2011/a-skunk-in-the-library/ .

Ore, E.S. (2015). A Nordic tradition for digital scholarly editions? Journal of the Japanese Association for Digital Humanities, 1(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.17928/ jjadh.1.1_58 .

Pal, K., Avery, N., Boston, P., Campagnolo, A., De Stefani, C., Matheson-Pollock, H., … Weyrich, T. (2016). Digitally reconstructing the Great Parchment Book: 3D recovery of fire-damaged historical documents. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw057 .

Palmer, C. (2004). Thematic research collections. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470999875.ch24 .

Pavlidis, G., Koutsoudis, A., Arnaoutoglou, F., Tsioukas, V., & Chamzas, C. (2007). Methods for 3D imaging of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2006.10.007 .

Pierazzo, E. (2015). Digital scholarly editing: Theories, models, and methods. London: Routledge.

Raitt, D. (2000). Digital library initiatives across Europe. Computers in Libraries, 20(10), 26–35. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov00/raitt. htm .

Renear, A. (2001). Literal transcription – Can the text ontologist Help? In D. Fiormonte & J. Usher (Eds.), New media and the humanities: Research and applications (pp. 31–38). Proceedings of the Computers, Literature and Philology (CLIP) Seminar. Edinburgh, 9–11 September 1998.

Sahle, P. (2016). What is a Scholarly Digital Edition (SDE)? In E. Pierazzo & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Digital Scholarly Editing: Theory, Practice, and Future Perspectives. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved July 16, 2019 from http://dx.doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0095.02 .

Schöneberg, H., Schmidt, H.-G., & Höhn, W. (2013). A scalable, distributed and dynamic workflow system for digitization processes. In J. Downie, R. McDonald, T. Cole, R. Sanderson, & F. Shipman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 359–362). Paper presented at the 13^th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Indianapolis, IN, USA, 22–26 July 2013. New York: Association for Computer Machinery. https://doi. org/10.1145/2467696.2467729 .

Schreibman, S. (2013). Digital scholarly editing. In K.M. Price & R. Siemens (Eds.), Literary studies in the digital age: An evolving anthology (n.p.). New York: Modern Language Association. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://dlsanthology.mla. hcommons.org/digital-scholarly-editing/ .

Shillingsburg, P. (1996). Scholarly editing in the computer age: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Terkel, H.J. (1994). Text and transmission: An empirical model for the literary development of Old Testament narratives. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Terras, M. (2015). Cultural heritage information: Artefacts and digitization. In G.G. Chowdhury & I. Ruthven (Eds.), Cultural heritage information: Access and management (1st ed., pp. 63–88). London: Facet.

Unsworth, J. (2000). Thematic research collections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Modern Language Association, Washington December 28. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http://people.virginia.edu/~jmu2m//MLA .00/.

Uppsala University Library. (2018). The library’s History. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from http://www.ub.uu.se/about-the-library/history-of-the-library/ .

Uppsala University Library. (2019). Digital labs. Retrieved August 9, 2019, from https://ub.uu.se/use-the-library/digital-labs-makerspace/ .

Van Hulle, D., & Shillingsburg, P. (2015). Orientations to text, revisited. Studies in Bibliography, 59(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/SIB.2015.0004 .

Whearty, B. (2018). Invisible in ‘The archive’: Librarians, archivists, and the Caswell test. Binghamton University, The Open Repository. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https:// orb.binghamton.edu/english_fac/4/ .

Xie, I., & Matusiak, K.K. (2015). Discover digital libraries: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.