Notes

1 We restrict ourselves to studying only researchers who create data on a small scale, since the large-scale data producers handle the RDM on their own. We here define small-scale – rather arbitrarily – to be up to 200 terabytes of data. This is a volume which few research projects exceed. As an example for comparison, there are over 200 petabytes of data stored at the CERN Data Centre (cf. e.g. Gaillard, 2017), so three orders of magnitude greater.

2 Cf. https://www.kth.se .

3 Cf. https://www.kth.se/kthb .

4 Cf. http://kth.diva-portal.org .

5 Cf. https://intra.kth.se/bibliometri/public/start .

6 Cf. https://www.kth.se/en/kthb/publicering/vagledning/ kth-s-policy-for-publicering-1.623564 .

7 Cf. https://www.kth.se/en/kthb/publicering/open-access/oa-erbjudanden-for-k/ oa-erbjudanden-for-kth-forskare .

8 Cf. https://miami.uni-muenster.de, https://www.ulb.uni-muenster.de/ wissenschaftliche-schriften/ , https://www.uni-muenster.de/Ejournals/ , and https://www.ulb.uni-muenster.de/publikationsfonds .

9 The distinction is not entire crystal clear, naturally.

10 Cf. e.g. the talk by Thalinger (2017). This performance-optimisation can seem like a minor detail for most of us, but for Twitter it means significant savings in electricity and hence money. Hypothetical example given was that renting 10,000 cloud servers would result in saving 353,280 dollar/year.

11 Cf. https://www.proteinatlas.org .

12 Cf. http://www.icos-sweden.se .

13 Or the related database SwePub, cf. http://www.swepub.se .

14 Cf. https://www.snic.se .

15 Cf. https://www.snic.se/resources/compute-resources/beskow/ .

16 Cf. https://supr.snic.se . Bigger allocations are possible, but they require a separate process, usually getting in touch with the SNIC Storage Coordinator. (Dejan Vitlacil, personal email communication, May 2018).

17 Cf. e.g. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geisteswissenschaft .

18 For some illustrated examples see e.g. Neuroth (2018). More interesting projects can be found e.g. in journals like “Frontiers in Digital Humanities” ( https://www. frontiersin.org/journals/digital-humanities ), the “Journal of Digital Humanities” ( http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org ), the “Journal of Open Humanities Data” ( https://openhumanitiesdata.metajnl.com ), in the blog of the DHd group ( https:// dhd-blog.org ), in Hahn et al. (2015) (chapter “Digital Humanities in der Praxis”) or on the projects site of the WWU Center for Digital Humanities ( https://www.uni muenster.de/CDH/projekte/ ).

19 Cf. https://ch.uni-leipzig.de/research/ . For an overview see e.g. Burghardt (2018a,b).

20 The platform “Allegro” can be tested under the address http://138.68.106.29/ .

21 “Wadi Abu Dom Itinerary (W.A.D.I.), cf. http://en.wadi-abu-dom.de . See https:// www.uni-muenster.de/news/view.php?cmdid=9565 for a short overview of the project.

22 WebGIS, cf. http://wadi-abu-dom.de/web-gis-2/ .

23 Project “Die Performanz der Wappen. Zur Entwicklung von Funktion und Bedeutung heraldischer Kommunikation in der mittelalterlichen Kultur (12.–15. Jahrhundert)” (“Coats of arms in practice. The history of heraldic communication in late medieval culture and society (12th–15th centuries)”); cf. https://www.uni muenster.de/Geschichte/histsem/JPGHuSMA/forschen/PerformanzderWappen. html .

24 Cf. for this chapter e.g. Owens (2011), Andorfer (2015), Cremer, Klaffki, and Steyer (2018), and especially DHd AG Datenzentren (2018), p. 5–11.

25 Cf. http://www.linguisticsdatacitation.org .

26 Cf. e.g. the discussion about data centres at the DHd 2018 conference, https://dhd blog.org/?p=9740 .

27 Cf. e.g. IANUS (2017) for different file formats used in Ancient Studies, Ingram (2017) for audio files, or Bollen (2016) for data in theatre studies.

28 Cf. https://adho.org .

29 Cf. https://dig-hum.de .

30 Cf. e.g. Kaden and Kleineberg (2018).

31 Cf. e.g. Hahn et al. (2015) (chapter “Forschungsinfrastrukturen nutzen”).

32 For more on data centres or data federations for the humanities cf. e.g. DHd AG Datenzentren (2018) or Gradl, Henrich, and Plutte (2015).

33 Cf. https://www.brill.com/rdj .

34 Cf. https://openhumanitiesdata.metajnl.com .

35 Cf. https://openarchaeologydata.metajnl.com .

36 Cf. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk

forfattningssamling/lag-2018218-med-kompletterande-bestammelser_sfs 2018-218 .

37 Cf. https://snd.gu.se/en .

38 Cf. https://internt.slu.se/stod-service/admin-stod/it/tjanster/systemutveckling/ verktyg-och-system-under-utveckling/tilda/ .

39 Cf. https://www.su.se/english/library/publish/research-data/policies-and

guidelines-1.359054 .

40 This was e.g. an approach advocated by several participants at the Research Data Alliance plenary meeting in Berlin, March 2018.

41 Cf. https://www.csc.fi/-/tryggve2-increases-nordic-efforts-within-e-infrastructure for-sensitive-data .

42 Cf. http://www.dfg.de/en/dfg_profile/alliance/ .

43 Cf. https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de .

44 Cf. http://www.rfii.de .

45 Cf. https://www.hrk.de .

46 Cf. http://fdm-nrw.de . For the activities leading to the Landesinitiative cf. e.g. Curdt et al., 2017.

47 Cf. https://www.dini.de .

48 Cf. http://www.langzeitarchivierung.de .

49 Cf. http://rda-deutschland.de .

50 Cf. http://www.forschungsdaten.org/index.php/AG_Forschungsdaten .

51 Cf. http://www.langzeitarchivierung.de .

52 Cf. http://www.forschungsdaten.org .

53 Cf. https://www.forschungsdaten.info .

54 Cf. http://forschungslizenzen.de .

55 Cf. https://de.dariah.eu .

56 Cf. https://www.clarin-d.net .

57 Cf. https://www.fdm-bayern.org .

58 Cf. https://www.ratswd.de/en/publications/working-papers .

59 Cf. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/antragstellung/

forschungsdaten/richtlinien_forschungsdaten_biodiversitaetsforschung.pdf .

60 Cf. e.g. http://www.forschungsdaten.org/index.php/Data_Policies for a list.

61 Two examples: the BASE search engine for open access documents was developed and hosted in Bielefeld (as its full name reveals: “Bielefeld Academic Search Engine”; cf. https://www.base-search.net ), and the Bielefeld library is one of the partners in the INTACT project monitoring APCs paid for open access journal articles (cf. https://www.intact-project.org ).

62 Cf. https://data.uni-bielefeld.de .

63 Cf. http://www.eresearch.uni-goettingen.de .

64 Cf. http://www.gcdh.de .

65 Cf. https://www.fdm.uni-hamburg.de .

66 Cf. https://www.fdm.uni-hannover.de .

67 Cf. http://cceh.uni-koeln.de .

68 Cf. http://dch.phil-fak.uni-koeln.de .

69 Cf. http://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/379522012?language=en .

70 Cf. http://www.esciences.uni-trier.de .

71 Cf. http://kompetenzzentrum.uni-trier.de .

72 Cf. http://www.fud.uni-trier.de . “FuD” stands for “Forschungsnetzwerk und Datenbanksystem”, “research network and database system”.

73 Cf. http://www.escience.uni-tuebingen.de .

74 Cf. https://www2.hu-berlin.de/edissplus/ ; cf. e.g. also Weisbrod, Kaden, & Kleineberg, 2017.

75 Cf. https://www.re3data.org/search?query=&countries[ ]=DEU. Germany has the highest number among the European countries. But as the r3data platform has been developed and is run by a consortium of mostly German institutions the numbers could be influenced by the fact that German repositories are perhaps more likely to be listed than those based in other countries.

76 Cf. http://risources.dfg.de .

77 Cf. https://www.datasealofapproval.org .

78 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV/Kooperationen/IKM_kooperation.html and https://www.uni-muenster.de/Rektorat/ikm/ .

79 “Grundsätze zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten an der Westfälischen Wilhelms- Universität Münster”, cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/Forschungsdaten/information/richtlinien/; up until now only available in German, an English translation is on its way.

80 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/Forschungsdaten/ .

81 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/news/view.php?cmdid=9529 .

82 Project “MIRO”; cf. https://www.ulb.uni-muenster.de/bibliothek/aktivitaeten/projekte/projekt_miro.html .

83 Project “LIFE” 2013–2015; cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/Geoinformatics/en/research/projects/LIFE.html.

84 Project “o2r”, 2015–2017, cf. http://o2r.info . An application for the follow-up project “o2r2” 2018–2021 has been submitted.

85 The same development can e.g. be seen at Trier University; cf. chapter 6.

86 For information about the German “Universities Excellence Initiative” cf. e.g. https://www.bmbf.de/en/excellence-strategy-5425.html or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Universities_Excellence_Initiative; for information about the WWU projects see https://www.uni-muenster.de/forschung/en/profil/exzellenzstrategie/.

87 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/Religion-und-Politik/en/ .

88 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/news/view.php?cmdid=9330 .

89 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/wwu/rektorat/

dokumente/180417_hochschulentwicklungsplan.pdf .

90 Cf. https://www.ulb.uni-muenster.de/digital-humanities , https://www.uni muenster.de/news/view.php?cmdid=8993 , https://www.uni-muenster.de/news/ view.php?cmdid=9040 .

91 “Research Data Management Organiser”, a web application project for planning, implementing and administering data in a scientific project; cf. https://rdmo.aip.de .

92 Cf. https://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV/Aktuell/2018/news25042018.html . sciebo. RDS expands sciebo, a non-commercial cloud storage and sharing service developed for 28 universities in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, led by the WWU IT Services; cf. https://www.sciebo.de/en/project/ . Elements that will be added by sciebo.RDS are e.g. the encoding of and checksums for data or a refined roles and rights management.

93 The WWU Institute for New Testament Textual Research (INTF) has e.g. commissioned the Cologne Center for eHumanities for a database project; cf. http://ntg.cceh.uni-koeln.de .

94 Cf. https://www.hbz-nrw.de/produkte/langzeitverfuegbarkeit/ langzeitverfuegbarkeit-fuer-hochschulen and http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/ products/rosetta-digital-asset-management-and-preservation/ .

95 Cf. http://www.library.ethz.ch/en/ms/Digitaler-Datenerhalt-an-der-ETH-Zuerich .

96 The three labels for the different stages in project consulting are taken from the Cologne Center for eHumanities; cf. e.g. Kronenwett, 2017, p. 33.

97 Cf. https://en.fh-muenster.de/bibliothek/ .

98 Cf. e.g. the fact that the German librarianship journal “o-bib” got so many responses for a Call for Papers regarding RDM services in libraries that the editors decided to do two special issues on the topic instead of only one (cf. Stäcker & Steenweg, 2018).

99 Cf. the answer of an Elsevier official replying to an statement arguing that access to information should not be limited to privileged people ( https://twitter.com/ mrgunn/status/1028812448063664129 ). For a discussion cf. e.g. https://twitter.com/ Protohedgehog/status/1028819653982736389 .