Alter, S. (2008). Service system fundamentals: Work system, value chain, and life cycle. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 71–85.

Alter, S. (2013). Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 14(2), 72–121.

Batt, C. (2015). Collecting Institutions in the Network Society (Doctoral Thesis). University College London, London, UK. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl. .

Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2010). Triple task method: Systemic, reflective action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23, 443–452. s11213-010-9171-7 .

Best, K. (2010). The fundamentals of design management. Lausanne, Switzerland: AVA Academic.

Bias, R.G., & Mayhew, D.J. (2005). Cost-justifying usability. An update for an internet age. Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Botero, A., Paterson, A.G., & Saad-Sulonen, J. (Eds.). (2012). Towards peer production in public services: Cases from Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University.

Bryson, J.M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter? Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. .

Carlsson, H. (2016). Library assessment and quality assurance—creating a staffdriven and user-focused development process. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(2), 28–33. .

Cockton, G. (2006). Designing worth is worth designing (pp. 165–174). Presented at the NordiCHI 2006, Oslo, Norway.

Cockton, G. (2008). Putting value into E-Valu-Ation. In E. Law, E. Hvannberg, &

G. Cockton (Eds.), Maturing usability: Quality in software, interaction and value (pp. 287–317). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Corrall, S. (2014). Designing libraries for research collaboration in the network world: An exploratory study. LIBER Quarterly, 24(1), 17–48. .

Corrall, S. (2015). Capturing the contribution of subject librarians. Applying strategy maps and balanced scorecards to liaison work. Library Management, 36(3), 223–234. .

Culén, A.L., & Gasparini, A.A. (2013). Student driven innovation: Designing University Library Services (pp. 12–17). Presented at the Centric 2013: The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies, and Services, IARIA.

Culén, A.L., & Stuedahl, D. (2017). Preface. Temporalities of engagement in design for public spaces. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 34, 113–117.

Daglio, M., Gerson, D., & Kitchen, H. (2014). Building organisational capacity for public sector innovation. Background report. Paris, France: OECD Conference “Innovating the Public Sector: from Ideas to Impact.” Retrieved from innovating-the-public-sector/Background-report.pdf .

Design Council. (2015). Design in the public sector. An evaluation of a programme of support for local authority service transformation. Retrieved from http://www. .

Donahue, G.M. (2001). Usability and the bottom line. Software, IEEE, 18(1), 31–37.

Düren, P., Landøy, A., & Saarti, J. (2017). New public management and libraries: A success story or just an excuse for cost reduction. Library Management, 38(8/9), 477–487. .

Eskerod, P., & Jepsen, A.L. (Eds.). (2013). Project stakeholder management. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Brussels.

Fleenor, J., Taylor, S., & Chappelow, C. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer.

Friedman, A.L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H. Jr., & Borning, A. (2008). Value sensitive design and information systems. In K.E. Himma & H.T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics. Weinheim, D.: John Wiley & Sons.

Guthrie, J., Marcon, G., Russo, S., & Farneti, F. (Eds.). (2014). Public value management, measurement and reporting (Vol. 3). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

Harpum, P. (2004). Design management. In P.W.G. Morris & J.K. Pinto (Eds.), The wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 422–449). New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Held, D., & Schott, G. (2006). Models of democracy (3.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Hernon, P., Altman, E., & Dugan, R.E. (2015). Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of library customers (3rd ed.). Chicago, USA: Americal Library Association.

Hirsch, S., Fraser, J., & Beckman, S. (2004). Leveraging business value: How ROI changes user experience (Adaptive Path Reports). San Francisco, CA: Adaptive Path.

Holmlid, S. (2010). From interaction to service. In S. Miettinen & M. Koivisto (Eds.), Designing services with innovative methods (pp. 78–97). Keuruu, Finland: University of Art and Design Helsinki/Kuopio Academy of Design, Savonia University of Applied Sciences.

Hormia-Poutanen, K., Kautonen, H., & Lassila, A. (2013). The Finnish National Digital Library: A national service is developed in collaboration with a network of libraries, archives and museums. Insights, 26, 60–65.

Hyndman, N., & Lapsley, I. (2016). New public management: The story continues. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(4), 385–408.

International Organization for Standardization. (2014). ISO 11620:2014. Information and documentation – Library performance indicators.

Kallinikos, J., Hasselbladh, H., & Marton, A. (2013). Governing social practice. Technology and institutional change. Theory and Society, 42(4), 395–421. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11186-013-9195-y .

Karat, C.-M. (2005). A business case approach to usability cost justification for the web. In R.G. Bias & D.J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-justifying usability. An update for an internet age (pp. 103–122). Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Keenoy, T., Oswick, C., Anthony, P., Grant, D., & Mangham, I. (2002). Interpretative times: The timescape of managerial decision making. In R. Whipp, B. Adam, & I. Sabelis (Eds.), Making time: Time and management in modern organizations (pp. 182–195). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Knuuttila, T. (2010). Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to modelbased representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 262–271. https:// .

Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Taylor & Francis.

Law, E., Hvannberg, E.T., & Cockton, G. (2008). A green paper on usability maturation. In E. Law, E. Hvannberg, & G. Cockton (Eds.), Maturing usability: Quality in software, interaction and value (pp. 381–424). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

LIBER. (2017). Research libraries powering sustainable knowledge in the digital age. LIBER Europe Strategy 2018–2022. The Hague, Netherlands.

Lilburn, J. (2017). Ideology and audit culture: Standardized service quality surveys in academic libraries. Libraries and the Academy, 17(1), 91–110. pla.2017.0006 .

Lockwood, T. (2007). Design value: A framework for measurement. Design Management Review, 18(4), 90–100.

Lockwood, T. (Ed.). (2009). Design thinking. Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York, USA: Allworth Press.

Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2005). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Mantei, M.M., & Teorey, T.J. (1988). Cost/benefit analysis for incorporating human factors in the software lifecycle. Communications of the ACM, 31(4), 428–439.

Mayhew, D.J., & Tremaine, M.M. (2005). A basic framework. In R.G. Bias & D.J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-justifying usability. An update for an internet age (pp. 41–101). Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Moore, M.H. (2014). Recognizing public value. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

Nelson, H.G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2.). Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.

O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366. .

Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2012). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. .

Passonneau, S.M. (2013). Library assessment activities: Using ISO 11620 to review the assessment data of academic libraries in North America. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 14(3), 175–196. .

Poll, R., & te Boekhorst, P. (2007). Measuring quality. Performance measurement in libraries (2nd revised). München, Germany: IFLA.

Priestner, A., & Borg, M. (Eds.). (2016). User experience in libraries. Applying ethnography and human-centered design. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Rajanen, M. (2011). Applying usability cost-benefit analysis – explorations in commercial and open source software development concepts (Doctoral Thesis). University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. Retrieved from .

Renard, P.-Y. (2007). ISO 2789 and ISO 11620: Short presentation of standards as reference documents in an assessment process. LIBER Quarterly, 17(3/4), n.p. .

Rosenberg, D. (2004). The myths of usability ROI. Interaction, 11(5), 22–29.

Rowley, J. (2011). Innovation for survival: From cooperation to collaboration. In A. Woodsworth (Ed.), Librarianship in times of crisis (pp. 207–224). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

Rubin, B.A. (2007a). New times redux: Layering time in the new economy. In B.A. Rubin (Ed.), Workplace temporalities (Vol. 17). Oxford, UK: Elsevier JAI.

Rubin, B.A. (Ed.). (2007b). Workplace temporalities (Vol. 17). Oxford, UK: Elsevier JAI.

Scott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. (2016). Measuring eGovernment success: A public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 25, 187–208.

Service Design Network. (2016). Service design impact report: Public sector. Retrieved from impact-report-public-sector .

Siegel, D.A. (2003). The business case for user-centered design: increasing your power of persuasion. Interactions 10(3), 30–36. .

Sikorski, M. (2008). HCI and the economics of user experience. In E. Law,

E. Hvannberg, & G. Cockton (Eds.), Maturing usability: Quality in software, interaction and value (pp. 318–343). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Sinikara, K. (2006). Evaluation as a tool for developing the quality of academic libraries. Case study at a large and traditional research oriented Scandinavian University. LIBER Quarterly, 16(3/4), n.p. .

Spano, A. (2014). How do we measure public value? From theory to practice. In J. Guthrie, G. Marcon, S. Russo, & F. Farneti (Eds.), Public value management, measurement and reporting (Vol. 3). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

Stenvall, J., & Virtanen, P. (2017). Intelligent public organisations. Public Organization Review, 17, 195–209. .

Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

Tanner, S. (2012). Measuring the impact of digital resources: The balanced value impact model. London, UK: King’s College London. Retrieved from http://www.kdcs.kcl. .

Tilley, E. (2016). Are you sitting comfortably...? In A. Priestner & M. Borg (Eds.), User experience in libraries. Applying ethnography and human-centered design (pp. 178–189). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21. https:// .

Voros, J. (2006). Introducing a classification framework for prospective methods. Foresight, 8(2), 43–56. .

Whicher, A., Raulik-Murphy, G., & Cawood, G. (2011). Evaluating design: Understanding the return on investment. Design Management Institute Review, 22(2), 45–52.

Whipp, R., Adam, B., & Sabelis, I. (Eds.). (2002). Making time: Time and management in modern organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Wiebe, E. (2011). Temporal sensemaking: Managers’ use of time to frame organizational change. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 213–241). Oxford University Press.

Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 30–42.