References

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https:// doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 .

Armstrong, R., Hall, B.J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/ pubmed/fdr015 .

Beverly, C.A., Booth, A., & Bath, P.A. (2003). The role of the information professional in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x .

COST. (2013). Working Group 4 – Preparation of a coherent textbook on optical nanospectroscopy. Retrieved February 29, 2016, from http://www.cost nanospectroscopy.eu/wg4.html .

Creaser, C., Cullen, S., Curtis, R., Darlington, N., Maltby, J., Newall, E., & Spezi, V. (2014). Working together: library value at the University of Nottingham. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(1/2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-03-2014-0011 .

Çulha, M. (2015). Nanospectroscopy (Editorial). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 407(27), 8175–8176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9033-3 .

Dudden, R.F., & Protzko, S.L. (2011). The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30(3), 301–315. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425 .

Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003 .

Glass, G.V. (1977). Integrating findings: the meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X005001351 .

Hey, T., & Hey, J. (2006). e-Science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi-tech, 24(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610715383 .

Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (Eds.) (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved December 19, 2017, from http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/ .

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K.K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69, 1–9. https://doi. org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 .

Mead, T.L., & Richards, D.T. (1995). Librarian participation in meta-analysis project. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83(4), 461–464. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC226066/ .

Meert, D., Torabi, N., & Costella, J. (2016). Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.139 .

Meixner, A.J. (2011). Nanophotonics, nano-optics and nanospectroscopy (Editorial). Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2011(2), 499–500. https://doi.org/10.3762/ bnjnano.2.53 .

Sarrami-Foroushani, P., Travaglia, J., Debono, D., Clay-Williams, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2015). Scoping meta-review: Introducing a new methodology. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12188 .

Schell, C.L., & Rathe, R.J. (1992). Meta-analysis: a tool for medical and scientific discoveries. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 80(3), 219–222. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC225660/ .

Swinkels, A., Briddon, J., & Hall, J. (2006). Two physiotherapists, one librarian and a systematic literature review: collaboration in action. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 23(4), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00689.x .

University of Texas Libraries. (2011). What’s a “review article?”. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from http://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/lsl/help/modules/review.html .