References

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of educational research, 81(2), 132-169. doi: 10.3102/0034654311404435.

Alvite, L., & Barrionuevo, L. (2011). Libraries for users: services in academic libraries. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Bourg, C., Coleman, R., & Erway, R. (2009). Support for the Research Process: An Academic Library Manifesto. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2009/2009-07.pdf.

Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 223-234. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1998.143059.x.

DEFF. (2009). The future of research and the research library: Retrieved March 3, 2010, from http://www.bibliotekogmedier.dk/publikationer/artikel/the-future-of-research-and-research-library/ .

Haglund, L., & Olsson, P. (2008). The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: A multiple case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.010.

Lankes, R. D. (2011). The atlas of new librarianship. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Law, D. (2010a). The changing roles and identities of library and information services staff. In G. Gordon and C. Whitchurch (eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: the challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 185-198). New York: Routledge.

Law, D. (2010b). Waiting for the barbarians: seeking solutions or awaiting answers? In S. McKnight (ed.), Envisioning future academic library services: initiatives, ideas and challenges (pp. 1-14). London: Facet.

McKnight, S. (Ed.). (2010). Envisioning future academic library services: initiatives, ideas and challenges. London: Facet.

Michalko, J., Malpas, C., & Arcolio, A. (2010). Research Libraries, Risk and Systemic Change, OCLC Research. Retrieved August 23, 2012 from http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/publications/library/2010/2010-03.pdf .

Moser, T., & Olsen, H. K. (2012). Barnehagens fysiske miljø i nyere faglitteratur : et systematisk litteratursøk for tidsrommet 2000-2010 [The physical environment in kindergartens as described in contempoprary literature]. In A. Krogstad (ed.), Rom for barnehage: flerfaglige perspektiver på barnehagens fysiske miljø [Space for kindergartens](pp. 287-304). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Schonfeld, R. C., & Housewright, R. (2010). Faculty Survey 2009: Key Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies: Ithaka S+R. Retrieved August 23, 2012 from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/faculty-survey-2009 .

Schörn, D. A. (2001). Den reflekterende praktiker: hvordan professionelle tænker, når de arbejder [The reflective practitioner - How professionals think in action]. Århus: Klim.

Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflection on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human values, 35, 601-617. doi: 10.1177/0162243910377624.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "transitions" and boundary object: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertabrate zoology. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387-420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001.

University College London. (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future: A ciber briefing paper Retrieved April 3, 2008, from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/slais/research/ciber/downloads/ggexecutive.pdf .

Webb, J., Gannon-Leary, P., & Bent, M. (2007). Providing effective library services for research. London: Facet Publ.